Cuba vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per

Cuba
895.45 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
966.54 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
120th
Zambia rank
118th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per over time

  • Cuba
  • Zambia
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 966.54 current US$ per square kilometre against 895.45 current US$ per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 71.09 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Zambia ahead.

Cuba ranks 120th and Zambia ranks 118th of 178 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1862 current US$ per square kilometre 49.54 current US$ per square kilometre 49.35 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1970s 130.52 current US$ per square kilometre 102.69 current US$ per square kilometre 27.83 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 80.47 current US$ per square kilometre 382.27 current US$ per square kilometre 301.81 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 373.42 current US$ per square kilometre 669.82 current US$ per square kilometre 296.41 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 623.27 current US$ per square kilometre 1,007 current US$ per square kilometre 383.88 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 3,435 current US$ per square kilometre 990.2 current US$ per square kilometre 2,445 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 1,039 current US$ per square kilometre 940.83 current US$ per square kilometre 98.35 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per, Cuba or Zambia?
Zambia, at 966.54 current US$ per square kilometre against 895.45 current US$ per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per between Cuba and Zambia?
71.09 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Zambia?
57 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Zambia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
Cuba ranks 120th and Zambia ranks 118th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/zambia/">Cuba vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 11,294 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.