Cameroon vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per

Cameroon
1,220 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1,318 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cameroon rank
110th
Zimbabwe rank
108th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per over time

  • Cameroon
  • Zimbabwe
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 1,318 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,220 current US$ per square kilometre in Cameroon, a difference of 98 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Cameroon's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cameroon ahead.

Cameroon ranks 110th and Zimbabwe ranks 108th of 178 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 60.63 current US$ per square kilometre 7.13 current US$ per square kilometre 53.5 current US$ per square kilometre Cameroon
1970s 193.26 current US$ per square kilometre 11.07 current US$ per square kilometre 182.19 current US$ per square kilometre Cameroon
1980s 428.47 current US$ per square kilometre 533 current US$ per square kilometre 104.53 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 923.95 current US$ per square kilometre 885.59 current US$ per square kilometre 38.36 current US$ per square kilometre Cameroon
2000s 1,467 current US$ per square kilometre 804.19 current US$ per square kilometre 662.59 current US$ per square kilometre Cameroon
2010s 1,105 current US$ per square kilometre 1,539 current US$ per square kilometre 433.9 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 1,368 current US$ per square kilometre 1,531 current US$ per square kilometre 162.5 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per, Cameroon or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 1,318 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,220 current US$ per square kilometre in Cameroon as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per between Cameroon and Zimbabwe?
98 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Zimbabwe?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cameroon and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
Cameroon ranks 110th and Zimbabwe ranks 108th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cameroon vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/zimbabwe/">Cameroon vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 11,294 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.