Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per was 1,318 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
1,318 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 2.8%
World rank
108th
of 178 countries
All-time high
1,986 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2012
All-time low
0.0258 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
62
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Zimbabwe, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Zimbabwe is 1,318 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is down 2.8% on the previous year and down 19.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Zimbabwe peaked at 1,986 current US$ per square kilometre in 2012 and was at its lowest, 0.0258 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Zimbabwe 108th out of 178 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Zimbabwe, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0258 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 28.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +108500.1% |
| 1964 | 11.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -59.2% |
| 1965 | 9.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.4% |
| 1966 | 0.7755 current US$ per square kilometre | -91.6% |
| 1967 | 0.7238 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.7% |
| 1968 | 5.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +617.9% |
| 1969 | 1.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.1% |
| 1970 | 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 1971 | 1.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.4% |
| 1972 | 2.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.6% |
| 1973 | 2.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1974 | 4.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +89.2% |
| 1975 | 10.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +151.0% |
| 1976 | 15.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.6% |
| 1977 | 17.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 1978 | 23.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.2% |
| 1979 | 32.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.5% |
| 1980 | 315.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +880.5% |
| 1981 | 362.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.1% |
| 1982 | 394.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 1983 | 506.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.5% |
| 1984 | 696.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.5% |
| 1985 | 563.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.1% |
| 1986 | 504.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 1987 | 703.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.5% |
| 1988 | 643.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.5% |
| 1989 | 638.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1990 | 796.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.7% |
| 1991 | 957.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.3% |
| 1992 | 1,443 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.6% |
| 1993 | 933.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.3% |
| 1994 | 974.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 1995 | 1,055 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.2% |
| 1996 | 881.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.4% |
| 1997 | 619.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.7% |
| 1998 | 615.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 1999 | 577.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 2000 | 494.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.4% |
| 2001 | 398.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.4% |
| 2002 | 476.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.7% |
| 2003 | 452.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 2004 | 504.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.4% |
| 2005 | 587.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.5% |
| 2006 | 658.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.1% |
| 2007 | 1,119 current US$ per square kilometre | +70.0% |
| 2008 | 1,541 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.7% |
| 2009 | 1,810 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.5% |
| 2010 | 1,589 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.2% |
| 2011 | 1,636 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2012 | 1,986 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.4% |
| 2013 | 1,631 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.9% |
| 2014 | 1,538 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 2015 | 1,357 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.8% |
| 2016 | 1,392 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2017 | 1,384 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 2018 | 1,383 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 2019 | 1,494 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 2020 | 1,784 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.4% |
| 2021 | 1,666 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.6% |
| 2022 | 1,356 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.6% |
| 2023 | 1,318 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 7.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0258 current US$ per square kilometre | 28.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 1970s | 11.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 32.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 533 current US$ per square kilometre | 315.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 703.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 885.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 577.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,443 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 804.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 398.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,810 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1,539 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,357 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,986 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1,531 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,318 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,784 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Zimbabwe
- 105 Tanzania, United Republic of 1,421 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 106 Nicaragua 1,412 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 107 India 1,344 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 109 Papua New Guinea 1,281 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 110 Cameroon 1,220 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 111 Uzbekistan 1,141 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Zimbabwe
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 75,834 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 331,066 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 7.24 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 35.67 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 9.72 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 17.35 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 6.26 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 36.25 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 575,259 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 12.78 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Zimbabwe?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Zimbabwe was 1,318 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The highest recorded value was 1,986 current US$ per square kilometre in 2012.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0258 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Zimbabwe rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
- Zimbabwe ranks 108th out of 178 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
- Over the last ten years it is down 19.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.