Tanzania vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per

Tanzania
1,421 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1,318 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania rank
105th
Zimbabwe rank
108th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per over time

  • Tanzania
  • Zimbabwe
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 1,421 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,318 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 103 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tanzania ahead.

Tanzania ranks 105th and Zimbabwe ranks 108th of 178 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Tanzania averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tanzania Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 38.03 current US$ per square kilometre 7.13 current US$ per square kilometre 30.9 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
1970s 219.86 current US$ per square kilometre 11.07 current US$ per square kilometre 208.79 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
1980s 650.15 current US$ per square kilometre 533 current US$ per square kilometre 117.15 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
1990s 838.58 current US$ per square kilometre 885.59 current US$ per square kilometre 47.01 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 1,413 current US$ per square kilometre 804.19 current US$ per square kilometre 608.54 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
2010s 1,888 current US$ per square kilometre 1,539 current US$ per square kilometre 348.87 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
2020s 1,434 current US$ per square kilometre 1,531 current US$ per square kilometre 97.12 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per, Tanzania or Zimbabwe?
Tanzania, at 1,421 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,318 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per between Tanzania and Zimbabwe?
103 current US$ per square kilometre, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania and Zimbabwe?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Tanzania and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
Tanzania ranks 105th and Zimbabwe ranks 108th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tanzania vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/tanzania/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/tanzania/zimbabwe/">Tanzania vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 11,294 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.