Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Tanzania, United Republic of
Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per was 1,421 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
1,421 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 7.2%
World rank
105th
of 178 countries
All-time high
2,324 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2013
All-time low
31.4 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1969
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Tanzania, United Republic of, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Tanzania, United Republic of recorded 1,421 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in 2023.
That represents a change of up 7.2% on the previous year and down 38.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Tanzania, United Republic of peaked at 2,324 current US$ per square kilometre in 2013 and was at its lowest, 31.4 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1969.
That places Tanzania, United Republic of 105th out of 178 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Tanzania, United Republic of, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 43.77 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 53.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.3% |
| 1963 | 34.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.2% |
| 1964 | 47.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.1% |
| 1965 | 39.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.4% |
| 1966 | 33.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.7% |
| 1967 | 36.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 1968 | 38.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1969 | 31.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.4% |
| 1970 | 42.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.3% |
| 1971 | 56.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.4% |
| 1972 | 60.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 1973 | 102.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.4% |
| 1974 | 158.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.9% |
| 1975 | 281.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +78.1% |
| 1976 | 246.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.7% |
| 1977 | 302.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.0% |
| 1978 | 398.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.6% |
| 1979 | 550.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.2% |
| 1980 | 619.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 1981 | 594 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 1982 | 581.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1983 | 515.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.4% |
| 1984 | 498.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 1985 | 454.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.9% |
| 1986 | 622.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.0% |
| 1987 | 849.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.4% |
| 1988 | 926.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 1989 | 839.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.4% |
| 1990 | 1,000 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.1% |
| 1991 | 908.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.2% |
| 1992 | 1,048 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.4% |
| 1993 | 812.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.4% |
| 1994 | 742.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.6% |
| 1995 | 734.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 1996 | 734.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 1997 | 715.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 1998 | 917.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.3% |
| 1999 | 772.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.8% |
| 2000 | 916.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.5% |
| 2001 | 1,170 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.7% |
| 2002 | 1,106 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 2003 | 1,300 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.6% |
| 2004 | 1,345 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2005 | 1,159 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.9% |
| 2006 | 1,337 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.4% |
| 2007 | 2,288 current US$ per square kilometre | +71.1% |
| 2008 | 1,759 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.1% |
| 2009 | 1,747 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 2010 | 2,085 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.3% |
| 2011 | 2,032 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 2012 | 2,141 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 2013 | 2,324 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 2014 | 1,754 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.5% |
| 2015 | 1,769 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2016 | 1,750 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 2017 | 1,754 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2018 | 1,873 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 2019 | 1,395 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.6% |
| 2020 | 1,551 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.2% |
| 2021 | 1,438 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 2022 | 1,325 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.9% |
| 2023 | 1,421 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 39.7 current US$ per square kilometre | 31.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 53.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 219.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 42.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 550.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 650.15 current US$ per square kilometre | 454.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 926.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 838.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 715.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,048 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1,413 current US$ per square kilometre | 916.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,288 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1,888 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,395 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,324 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1,434 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,325 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,551 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Tanzania, United Republic of
- 102 Cayman Islands 1,667 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 103 Tajikistan 1,617 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 104 Türkiye 1,600 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 106 Nicaragua 1,412 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 107 India 1,344 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 108 Zimbabwe 1,318 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Tanzania, United Republic of
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 3.00 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 9.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 37.92 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 120.60 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 34.66 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 54.25 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 121.44 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 37.02 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 7.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 16.94 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Tanzania, United Republic of was 1,421 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- The highest recorded value was 2,324 current US$ per square kilometre in 2013.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- The lowest recorded value was 31.4 current US$ per square kilometre in 1969.
- How does Tanzania, United Republic of rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
- Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 105th out of 178 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per rising or falling in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Over the last ten years it is down 38.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tanzania, United Republic of data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.