Eswatini vs Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per

Eswatini
4,942 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
4,923 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
58th
Sri Lanka rank
60th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per over time

  • Eswatini
  • Sri Lanka
05.0k10.0k15.0k196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 4,942 current US$ per square kilometre against 4,923 current US$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, a difference of 19 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 58th and Sri Lanka ranks 60th of 178 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Sri Lanka in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 552.13 current US$ per square kilometre 389.27 current US$ per square kilometre 162.86 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 915.7 current US$ per square kilometre 1,660 current US$ per square kilometre 744.79 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 1,543 current US$ per square kilometre 5,672 current US$ per square kilometre 4,128 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1990s 1,966 current US$ per square kilometre 5,187 current US$ per square kilometre 3,221 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2000s 1,256 current US$ per square kilometre 6,689 current US$ per square kilometre 5,433 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2010s 4,542 current US$ per square kilometre 4,431 current US$ per square kilometre 111.32 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 5,285 current US$ per square kilometre 3,576 current US$ per square kilometre 1,709 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per, Eswatini or Sri Lanka?
Eswatini, at 4,942 current US$ per square kilometre against 4,923 current US$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per between Eswatini and Sri Lanka?
19 current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sri Lanka?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Sri Lanka rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
Eswatini ranks 58th and Sri Lanka ranks 60th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/sri-lanka/">Eswatini vs Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 11,294 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.