Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per was 4,923 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
4,923 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 46.0%
World rank
60th
of 178 countries
All-time high
13,970 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2005
All-time low
133.63 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1964
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Sri Lanka, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Sri Lanka stood at 4,923 current US$ per square kilometre.
That represents a change of up 46.0% on the previous year and down 2.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Sri Lanka peaked at 13,970 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005 and was at its lowest, 133.63 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1964.
Sri Lanka ranks 60th of 178 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Sri Lanka, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 191.2 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 203.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 1963 | 170.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.2% |
| 1964 | 133.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.8% |
| 1965 | 217.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +63.1% |
| 1966 | 451.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +107.2% |
| 1967 | 719.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.2% |
| 1968 | 676.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.9% |
| 1969 | 738 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 1970 | 708.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 1971 | 743.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 1972 | 781.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1973 | 703.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 1974 | 970.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.9% |
| 1975 | 1,789 current US$ per square kilometre | +84.4% |
| 1976 | 1,591 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.0% |
| 1977 | 2,000 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.7% |
| 1978 | 3,550 current US$ per square kilometre | +77.4% |
| 1979 | 3,769 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 1980 | 4,830 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.1% |
| 1981 | 4,900 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1982 | 5,069 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1983 | 5,748 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.4% |
| 1984 | 5,349 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.9% |
| 1985 | 5,567 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1986 | 6,394 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.9% |
| 1987 | 5,387 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.8% |
| 1988 | 7,072 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.3% |
| 1989 | 6,401 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.5% |
| 1990 | 6,689 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1991 | 7,337 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 1992 | 4,176 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.1% |
| 1993 | 5,218 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 1994 | 5,540 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 1995 | 6,117 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 1996 | 4,564 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.4% |
| 1997 | 3,781 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.1% |
| 1998 | 4,848 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.2% |
| 1999 | 3,603 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.7% |
| 2000 | 4,088 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.5% |
| 2001 | 4,749 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.2% |
| 2002 | 3,380 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.8% |
| 2003 | 4,830 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.9% |
| 2004 | 5,699 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.0% |
| 2005 | 13,970 current US$ per square kilometre | +145.1% |
| 2006 | 8,525 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.0% |
| 2007 | 6,417 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.7% |
| 2008 | 8,298 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.3% |
| 2009 | 6,932 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.5% |
| 2010 | 6,968 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 2011 | 6,912 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 2012 | 6,424 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 2013 | 5,028 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.7% |
| 2014 | 5,190 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2015 | 4,278 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.6% |
| 2016 | 1,803 current US$ per square kilometre | -57.9% |
| 2017 | 2,325 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.0% |
| 2018 | 2,473 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 2019 | 2,904 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.4% |
| 2020 | 2,932 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2021 | 3,076 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2022 | 3,373 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 2023 | 4,923 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 389.27 current US$ per square kilometre | 133.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 738 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 1,660 current US$ per square kilometre | 703.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 3,769 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 5,672 current US$ per square kilometre | 4,830 current US$ per square kilometre | 7,072 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 5,187 current US$ per square kilometre | 3,603 current US$ per square kilometre | 7,337 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 6,689 current US$ per square kilometre | 3,380 current US$ per square kilometre | 13,970 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 4,431 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,803 current US$ per square kilometre | 6,968 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 3,576 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,932 current US$ per square kilometre | 4,923 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Sri Lanka
- 57 Benin 5,071 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 58 Eswatini 4,942 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 59 Poland 4,940 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 61 Tunisia 4,794 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 62 Slovakia 4,729 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 63 Cambodia 4,679 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Sri Lanka
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 743,046 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 104,629 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 10.44 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 28.32 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 3.69 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 26.12 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 5.01 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 9.57 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 441,093 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 76.61 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Sri Lanka?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Sri Lanka was 4,923 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Sri Lanka?
- The highest recorded value was 13,970 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Sri Lanka?
- The lowest recorded value was 133.63 current US$ per square kilometre in 1964.
- How does Sri Lanka rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
- Sri Lanka ranks 60th out of 178 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per rising or falling in Sri Lanka?
- Over the last ten years it is down 2.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Sri Lanka data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.