Sri Lanka vs Tunisia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per

Sri Lanka
4,923 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
4,794 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka rank
60th
Tunisia rank
61st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per over time

  • Sri Lanka
  • Tunisia
05.0k10.0k15.0k196119922023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 4,923 current US$ per square kilometre against 4,794 current US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 129 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tunisia ahead.

Sri Lanka ranks 60th and Tunisia ranks 61st of 178 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 4 and Tunisia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sri Lanka Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 389.27 current US$ per square kilometre 517.82 current US$ per square kilometre 128.55 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1970s 1,660 current US$ per square kilometre 888.97 current US$ per square kilometre 771.52 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 5,672 current US$ per square kilometre 1,183 current US$ per square kilometre 4,489 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1990s 5,187 current US$ per square kilometre 1,346 current US$ per square kilometre 3,841 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2000s 6,689 current US$ per square kilometre 2,169 current US$ per square kilometre 4,519 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2010s 4,431 current US$ per square kilometre 4,553 current US$ per square kilometre 121.97 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 3,576 current US$ per square kilometre 6,233 current US$ per square kilometre 2,657 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per, Sri Lanka or Tunisia?
Sri Lanka, at 4,923 current US$ per square kilometre against 4,794 current US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per between Sri Lanka and Tunisia?
129 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Tunisia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Sri Lanka and Tunisia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
Sri Lanka ranks 60th and Tunisia ranks 61st of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sri Lanka vs Tunisia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sri-lanka/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sri-lanka/tunisia/">Sri Lanka vs Tunisia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 11,294 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.