Europe & Central Asia vs Malta: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per

Europe & Central Asia
1,651 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
34,844 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2002
Europe & Central Asia rank
13th
Malta rank
15th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per over time

  • Europe & Central Asia
  • Malta
0100.0k200.0k196119922023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 34,844 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,651 current US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia, a difference of 33,193 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 21.1 times Europe & Central Asia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

Europe & Central Asia ranks 13th and Malta ranks 15th of 44 groups.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia Malta Difference Ahead
1960s 52.38 current US$ per square kilometre 46,983 current US$ per square kilometre 46,930 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1970s 34.97 current US$ per square kilometre 63,666 current US$ per square kilometre 63,631 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1980s 74.34 current US$ per square kilometre 39,306 current US$ per square kilometre 39,232 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1990s 110.63 current US$ per square kilometre 83,934 current US$ per square kilometre 83,824 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2000s 157.08 current US$ per square kilometre 37,260 current US$ per square kilometre 37,103 current US$ per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per, Europe & Central Asia or Malta?
Malta, at 34,844 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,651 current US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia as of 2002.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per between Europe & Central Asia and Malta?
33,193 current US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia and Malta?
42 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2002.
How do Europe & Central Asia and Malta rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
Europe & Central Asia ranks 13th and Malta ranks 15th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia vs Malta: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/europe-and-central-asia/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/europe-and-central-asia/malta/">Europe & Central Asia vs Malta: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 11,294 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.