Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Europe & Central Asia
Europe & Central Asia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per was 1,651 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
1,651 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 34.4%
Rank
13th
of 44 groups
All-time high
1,651 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
11.09 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1975
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Europe & Central Asia, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Europe & Central Asia recorded 1,651 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
The figure is up 34.4% on the previous year and up 497.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia peaked at 1,651 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 11.09 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1975.
That places Europe & Central Asia 13th out of 44 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Europe & Central Asia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 68.4 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 75 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 1963 | 71.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 1964 | 49.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.4% |
| 1965 | 47.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.4% |
| 1966 | 54.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.5% |
| 1967 | 39.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.8% |
| 1968 | 33.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.6% |
| 1969 | 31.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.9% |
| 1970 | 22.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.5% |
| 1971 | 32.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.2% |
| 1972 | 48.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.5% |
| 1973 | 36.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.5% |
| 1974 | 19.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.0% |
| 1975 | 11.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.3% |
| 1976 | 28.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +157.0% |
| 1977 | 22.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.2% |
| 1978 | 26.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.0% |
| 1979 | 101.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +283.5% |
| 1980 | 134.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.6% |
| 1981 | 100.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.1% |
| 1982 | 100.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1983 | 61.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.1% |
| 1984 | 40.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.2% |
| 1985 | 36.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.5% |
| 1986 | 67.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +84.0% |
| 1987 | 85.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.6% |
| 1988 | 69.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.7% |
| 1989 | 45.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.3% |
| 1990 | 116.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +157.7% |
| 1991 | 321.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +176.1% |
| 1992 | 62.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -80.4% |
| 1993 | 96.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.6% |
| 1994 | 77.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.8% |
| 1995 | 78.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1996 | 82.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 1997 | 67.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.9% |
| 1998 | 74.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.9% |
| 1999 | 128.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +71.7% |
| 2000 | 138.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 2001 | 135.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 2002 | 197 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.1% |
| 2003 | 138.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.9% |
| 2004 | 131.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 2005 | 147.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.0% |
| 2006 | 186.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.3% |
| 2007 | 172.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.5% |
| 2008 | 225.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.0% |
| 2009 | 243.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.1% |
| 2010 | 208.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.5% |
| 2011 | 324.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.7% |
| 2012 | 301.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 2013 | 276.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.5% |
| 2014 | 319.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.7% |
| 2015 | 245.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.2% |
| 2016 | 299.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.8% |
| 2017 | 285.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 2018 | 229.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.6% |
| 2019 | 207.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.4% |
| 2020 | 301.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.8% |
| 2021 | 324.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 2022 | 1,229 current US$ per square kilometre | +278.1% |
| 2023 | 1,651 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 52.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 31.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 75 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 34.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 101.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 74.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 36.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 134.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 110.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 62.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 321.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 171.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 131.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 243.9 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 269.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 207.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 324.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 876.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 301.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,651 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Europe & Central Asia
- 10 Maldives 62,174 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 11 Saint Kitts and Nevis 55,968 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 12 Palau 55,819 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 13 Sao Tome and Principe 38,526 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 14 Mauritius 38,188 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 15 Malta 34,844 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 16 Barbados 34,419 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Europe & Central Asia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 197.79 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 85.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.03 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 23.30 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 419.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1.28 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 636.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 416.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 92.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.20 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia was 1,651 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Europe & Central Asia?
- The highest recorded value was 1,651 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Europe & Central Asia?
- The lowest recorded value was 11.09 current US$ per square kilometre in 1975.
- How does Europe & Central Asia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
- Europe & Central Asia ranks 13th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per rising or falling in Europe & Central Asia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 497.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Europe & Central Asia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.