Guatemala vs Lesotho: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per

Guatemala
3,655 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Lesotho
3,599 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
70th
Lesotho rank
71st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per over time

  • Guatemala
  • Lesotho
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 3,655 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,599 current US$ per square kilometre in Lesotho, a difference of 56 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 70th and Lesotho ranks 71st of 178 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Lesotho in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Lesotho Difference Ahead
1960s 113.47 current US$ per square kilometre 283.67 current US$ per square kilometre 170.2 current US$ per square kilometre Lesotho
1970s 232.06 current US$ per square kilometre 616.93 current US$ per square kilometre 384.87 current US$ per square kilometre Lesotho
1980s 929.51 current US$ per square kilometre 2,325 current US$ per square kilometre 1,395 current US$ per square kilometre Lesotho
1990s 1,828 current US$ per square kilometre 2,412 current US$ per square kilometre 583.81 current US$ per square kilometre Lesotho
2000s 3,013 current US$ per square kilometre 1,860 current US$ per square kilometre 1,154 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 2,936 current US$ per square kilometre 4,077 current US$ per square kilometre 1,141 current US$ per square kilometre Lesotho
2020s 3,665 current US$ per square kilometre 3,467 current US$ per square kilometre 197.91 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per, Guatemala or Lesotho?
Guatemala, at 3,655 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,599 current US$ per square kilometre in Lesotho as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per between Guatemala and Lesotho?
56 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Lesotho?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Lesotho rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
Guatemala ranks 70th and Lesotho ranks 71st of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Lesotho: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/lesotho/">Guatemala vs Lesotho: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 11,294 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.