Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Guatemala
Guatemala: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per was 3,655 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
3,655 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 0.6%
World rank
70th
of 178 countries
All-time high
4,748 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
All-time low
83.99 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1966
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Guatemala, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Guatemala is 3,655 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is down 0.6% on the previous year and up 21.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Guatemala peaked at 4,748 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008 and was at its lowest, 83.99 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1966.
Guatemala ranks 70th of 178 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Guatemala, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 139.98 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 84.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.9% |
| 1963 | 94.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.2% |
| 1964 | 108.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.1% |
| 1965 | 122.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.0% |
| 1966 | 83.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.6% |
| 1967 | 128.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.1% |
| 1968 | 142.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.9% |
| 1969 | 116.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.5% |
| 1970 | 126.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 1971 | 104.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.9% |
| 1972 | 167.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.0% |
| 1973 | 160.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.2% |
| 1974 | 189.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.9% |
| 1975 | 250.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.1% |
| 1976 | 415.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +65.6% |
| 1977 | 347.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.4% |
| 1978 | 245.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.3% |
| 1979 | 312.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.4% |
| 1980 | 312.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 293.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 1982 | 293.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 1983 | 462.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.6% |
| 1984 | 377.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.4% |
| 1985 | 585.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.9% |
| 1986 | 1,041 current US$ per square kilometre | +77.9% |
| 1987 | 2,053 current US$ per square kilometre | +97.2% |
| 1988 | 1,838 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 1989 | 2,038 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.9% |
| 1990 | 1,494 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.7% |
| 1991 | 1,550 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1992 | 1,726 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.4% |
| 1993 | 1,831 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1994 | 1,638 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 1995 | 1,691 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1996 | 1,604 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.2% |
| 1997 | 2,245 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.0% |
| 1998 | 2,008 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.6% |
| 1999 | 2,493 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.2% |
| 2000 | 2,345 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.9% |
| 2001 | 2,068 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.8% |
| 2002 | 2,165 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 2003 | 2,261 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2004 | 2,126 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.0% |
| 2005 | 2,339 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 2006 | 4,471 current US$ per square kilometre | +91.1% |
| 2007 | 4,162 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.9% |
| 2008 | 4,748 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.1% |
| 2009 | 3,447 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.4% |
| 2010 | 3,614 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 2011 | 3,002 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.9% |
| 2012 | 2,753 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 2013 | 3,010 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.3% |
| 2014 | 2,451 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.6% |
| 2015 | 2,244 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.4% |
| 2016 | 2,337 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 2017 | 3,050 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.5% |
| 2018 | 3,429 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.4% |
| 2019 | 3,471 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2020 | 3,054 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.0% |
| 2021 | 4,276 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.0% |
| 2022 | 3,675 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.0% |
| 2023 | 3,655 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 113.47 current US$ per square kilometre | 83.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 142.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 232.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 104.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 415.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 929.51 current US$ per square kilometre | 293.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,053 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 1,828 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,494 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,493 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 3,013 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,068 current US$ per square kilometre | 4,748 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 2,936 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,244 current US$ per square kilometre | 3,614 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 3,665 current US$ per square kilometre | 3,054 current US$ per square kilometre | 4,276 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Guatemala
- 67 Afghanistan 3,946 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 68 Romania 3,918 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 69 Côte d'Ivoire 3,804 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 71 Lesotho 3,599 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 72 Czechia 3,587 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 73 Nepal 3,474 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Guatemala
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 5.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 2.28 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 13.46 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 27.60 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 3.77 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 22.87 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 4.31 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.21 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.70 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -158,126 current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Guatemala?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Guatemala was 3,655 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Guatemala?
- The highest recorded value was 4,748 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Guatemala?
- The lowest recorded value was 83.99 current US$ per square kilometre in 1966.
- How does Guatemala rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
- Guatemala ranks 70th out of 178 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per rising or falling in Guatemala?
- Over the last ten years it is up 21.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Guatemala data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.