Guatemala vs Nepal: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per

Guatemala
3,655 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
3,474 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
70th
Nepal rank
73rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per over time

  • Guatemala
  • Nepal
02.0k4.0k6.0k196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 3,655 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,474 current US$ per square kilometre in Nepal, a difference of 181 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 70th and Nepal ranks 73rd of 178 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 4 and Nepal in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 113.47 current US$ per square kilometre 89.93 current US$ per square kilometre 23.54 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1970s 232.06 current US$ per square kilometre 229.62 current US$ per square kilometre 2.44 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 929.51 current US$ per square kilometre 1,031 current US$ per square kilometre 101.42 current US$ per square kilometre Nepal
1990s 1,828 current US$ per square kilometre 1,775 current US$ per square kilometre 52.49 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 3,013 current US$ per square kilometre 2,557 current US$ per square kilometre 456.51 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 2,936 current US$ per square kilometre 4,242 current US$ per square kilometre 1,306 current US$ per square kilometre Nepal
2020s 3,665 current US$ per square kilometre 3,980 current US$ per square kilometre 315.56 current US$ per square kilometre Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per, Guatemala or Nepal?
Guatemala, at 3,655 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,474 current US$ per square kilometre in Nepal as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per between Guatemala and Nepal?
181 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Nepal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Nepal rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
Guatemala ranks 70th and Nepal ranks 73rd of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Nepal: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/nepal/">Guatemala vs Nepal: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 11,294 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.