Mexico vs Suriname: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per

Mexico
211.56 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
220.21 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico rank
145th
Suriname rank
144th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per over time

  • Mexico
  • Suriname
02004006008001.0k196119922023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 220.21 current US$ per square kilometre against 211.56 current US$ per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 8.65 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Suriname ahead.

Mexico ranks 145th and Suriname ranks 144th of 178 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 14.75 current US$ per square kilometre 70.83 current US$ per square kilometre 56.08 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
1970s 7.41 current US$ per square kilometre 351.2 current US$ per square kilometre 343.79 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
1980s 65.53 current US$ per square kilometre 231.96 current US$ per square kilometre 166.43 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
1990s 120.15 current US$ per square kilometre 414.18 current US$ per square kilometre 294.04 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
2000s 53.84 current US$ per square kilometre 365.5 current US$ per square kilometre 311.66 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 294.83 current US$ per square kilometre 183.55 current US$ per square kilometre 111.27 current US$ per square kilometre Mexico
2020s 279.78 current US$ per square kilometre 150.24 current US$ per square kilometre 129.54 current US$ per square kilometre Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per, Mexico or Suriname?
Suriname, at 220.21 current US$ per square kilometre against 211.56 current US$ per square kilometre in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per between Mexico and Suriname?
8.65 current US$ per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mexico and Suriname rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
Mexico ranks 145th and Suriname ranks 144th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Suriname: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mexico/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-total-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mexico/suriname/">Mexico vs Suriname: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 11,294 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.