Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Suriname
Suriname: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per was 220.21 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
220.21 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 11.1%
World rank
144th
of 178 countries
All-time high
941.45 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2009
All-time low
18.88 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1983
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Suriname, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Suriname recorded 220.21 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 11.1% on the previous year and up 34.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Suriname peaked at 941.45 current US$ per square kilometre in 2009 and was at its lowest, 18.88 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1983.
Suriname ranks 144th of 178 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Suriname, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 64.17 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 55.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.4% |
| 1963 | 81.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.3% |
| 1964 | 71.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.7% |
| 1965 | 101.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.0% |
| 1966 | 21.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -78.8% |
| 1967 | 23.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.1% |
| 1968 | 110.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +374.3% |
| 1969 | 108.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 1970 | 154.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.3% |
| 1971 | 165.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 1972 | 215.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.9% |
| 1973 | 178.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.1% |
| 1974 | 293.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +64.5% |
| 1975 | 321.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 1976 | 642.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +99.5% |
| 1977 | 557.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.1% |
| 1978 | 402.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.9% |
| 1979 | 581.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.5% |
| 1980 | 501.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.7% |
| 1981 | 592.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.1% |
| 1982 | 623.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1983 | 18.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -97.0% |
| 1984 | 28.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.8% |
| 1985 | 24.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.8% |
| 1986 | 29.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.1% |
| 1987 | 62.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +109.0% |
| 1988 | 128.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +106.9% |
| 1989 | 310.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +141.2% |
| 1990 | 374.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.7% |
| 1991 | 263.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.6% |
| 1992 | 485.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +84.4% |
| 1993 | 479.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 1994 | 371.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.6% |
| 1995 | 470.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.7% |
| 1996 | 669.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.4% |
| 1997 | 466.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.4% |
| 1998 | 355.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.8% |
| 1999 | 205.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.1% |
| 2000 | 194.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 2001 | 132.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.0% |
| 2002 | 62.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.2% |
| 2003 | 50.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.2% |
| 2004 | 140.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +175.8% |
| 2005 | 246.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +75.8% |
| 2006 | 362.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.3% |
| 2007 | 909.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +150.6% |
| 2008 | 614.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.4% |
| 2009 | 941.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.2% |
| 2010 | 605.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.7% |
| 2011 | 461.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.7% |
| 2012 | 179.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.2% |
| 2013 | 163.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.7% |
| 2014 | 62.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.6% |
| 2015 | 71.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.6% |
| 2016 | 77.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 2017 | 87.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.8% |
| 2018 | 56.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.6% |
| 2019 | 69.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.0% |
| 2020 | 78.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.1% |
| 2021 | 55.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.5% |
| 2022 | 247.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +349.5% |
| 2023 | 220.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 70.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 110.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 351.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 154.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 642.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 231.96 current US$ per square kilometre | 18.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 623.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 414.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 205.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 669.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 365.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 50.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 941.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 183.55 current US$ per square kilometre | 56.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 605.51 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 150.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 55.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 247.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Suriname
- 141 Bahamas 281.72 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 142 Equatorial Guinea 251.09 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 143 Paraguay 248.56 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 145 Mexico 211.56 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 146 Uruguay 187.59 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 147 Mauritania 181.65 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Suriname
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 78,909 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 50,796 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 9.92 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 41,736 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 78,978 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France -1.37 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 6,620 current US$ (2021)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 14.10 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 3.02 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Suriname?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Suriname was 220.21 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Suriname?
- The highest recorded value was 941.45 current US$ per square kilometre in 2009.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Suriname?
- The lowest recorded value was 18.88 current US$ per square kilometre in 1983.
- How does Suriname rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
- Suriname ranks 144th out of 178 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per rising or falling in Suriname?
- Over the last ten years it is up 34.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Suriname data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.