Brazil vs Least developed countries: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)

Brazil
77.55 million current US$
in 2023
Least developed countries
1.48 billion current US$
in 2022
Brazil rank
9th
Least developed countries rank
7th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time

  • Brazil
  • Least developed countries
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B196119922023

How they compare

Least developed countries currently reports 1.48 billion current US$ against 77.55 million current US$ in Brazil, a difference of 1.40 billion current US$.

That makes Least developed countries's figure about 19.0 times Brazil's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, Least developed countries has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 9th and Least developed countries ranks 7th of 169 countries.

Least developed countries has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Least developed countries Difference Ahead
1970s 1.92 million current US$ 146.15 million current US$ 144.24 million current US$ Least developed countries
1980s 4.70 million current US$ 346.89 million current US$ 342.19 million current US$ Least developed countries
1990s 7.82 million current US$ 559.12 million current US$ 551.30 million current US$ Least developed countries
2000s 10.08 million current US$ 1.79 billion current US$ 1.78 billion current US$ Least developed countries
2010s 39.88 million current US$ 3.33 billion current US$ 3.29 billion current US$ Least developed countries
2020s 33.44 million current US$ 2.11 billion current US$ 2.07 billion current US$ Least developed countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), Brazil or Least developed countries?
Least developed countries, at 1.48 billion current US$ against 77.55 million current US$ in Brazil as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between Brazil and Least developed countries?
1.40 billion current US$, with Least developed countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Least developed countries?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do Brazil and Least developed countries rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
Brazil ranks 9th and Least developed countries ranks 7th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Least developed countries: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-gaps-filled/brazil/least-developed-countries-un-classification/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-gaps-filled/brazil/least-developed-countries-un-classification/">Brazil vs Least developed countries: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 10,301 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) with 238 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.