Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Least developed countries

Least developed countries: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) was 1.48 billion current US$ in 2022. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2022)
1.48 billion current US$
Change on year
down 22.2%
Rank
7th
of 45 groups
All-time high
3.81 billion current US$
in 2015
All-time low
57.87 million current US$
in 1970
Years of data
53
1970–2022

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Least developed countries, 1970–2022

01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B197019962022

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.

Analysis

The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Least developed countries is 1.48 billion current US$, measured in 2022.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 22.2% on the previous year and down 51.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Least developed countries peaked at 3.81 billion current US$ in 2015 and was at its lowest, 57.87 million current US$, in 1970.

That places Least developed countries 7th out of 45 groups with data for 2022, putting it in the top quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Least developed countries, year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), gaps filled in Least developed countries, 1970 to 2022.
Year current US$ Change
1970 57.87 million current US$
1971 71.78 million current US$ +24.0%
1972 88.00 million current US$ +22.6%
1973 81.48 million current US$ -7.4%
1974 101.69 million current US$ +24.8%
1975 147.42 million current US$ +45.0%
1976 131.95 million current US$ -10.5%
1977 161.16 million current US$ +22.1%
1978 257.10 million current US$ +59.5%
1979 363.08 million current US$ +41.2%
1980 426.36 million current US$ +17.4%
1981 373.89 million current US$ -12.3%
1982 296.94 million current US$ -20.6%
1983 248.95 million current US$ -16.2%
1984 222.54 million current US$ -10.6%
1985 274.15 million current US$ +23.2%
1986 279.00 million current US$ +1.8%
1987 363.80 million current US$ +30.4%
1988 507.25 million current US$ +39.4%
1989 476.00 million current US$ -6.2%
1990 463.44 million current US$ -2.6%
1991 565.88 million current US$ +22.1%
1992 585.22 million current US$ +3.4%
1993 408.77 million current US$ -30.2%
1994 569.21 million current US$ +39.2%
1995 557.22 million current US$ -2.1%
1996 565.79 million current US$ +1.5%
1997 558.36 million current US$ -1.3%
1998 686.46 million current US$ +22.9%
1999 630.87 million current US$ -8.1%
2000 1.01 billion current US$ +60.9%
2001 1.07 billion current US$ +5.6%
2002 861.41 million current US$ -19.6%
2003 1.36 billion current US$ +58.3%
2004 2.20 billion current US$ +61.4%
2005 1.75 billion current US$ -20.5%
2006 2.15 billion current US$ +23.0%
2007 2.32 billion current US$ +7.8%
2008 2.57 billion current US$ +11.0%
2009 2.56 billion current US$ -0.3%
2010 2.60 billion current US$ +1.2%
2011 3.34 billion current US$ +28.8%
2012 3.04 billion current US$ -9.1%
2013 3.55 billion current US$ +16.7%
2014 3.80 billion current US$ +7.2%
2015 3.81 billion current US$ +0.2%
2016 3.17 billion current US$ -16.7%
2017 3.32 billion current US$ +4.5%
2018 3.19 billion current US$ -3.9%
2019 3.46 billion current US$ +8.5%
2020 2.94 billion current US$ -14.9%
2021 1.90 billion current US$ -35.5%
2022 1.48 billion current US$ -22.2%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1970s 146.15 million current US$ 57.87 million current US$ 363.08 million current US$ 10
1980s 346.89 million current US$ 222.54 million current US$ 507.25 million current US$ 10
1990s 559.12 million current US$ 408.77 million current US$ 686.46 million current US$ 10
2000s 1.79 billion current US$ 861.41 million current US$ 2.57 billion current US$ 10
2010s 3.33 billion current US$ 2.60 billion current US$ 3.81 billion current US$ 10
2020s 2.11 billion current US$ 1.48 billion current US$ 2.94 billion current US$ 3

Countries ranked near Least developed countries

  1. 4 Syrian Arab Republic 136.10 million current US$ compare
  2. 5 Nigeria 123.98 million current US$ compare
  3. 6 Yemen 122.16 million current US$ compare
  4. 7 Somalia 121.25 million current US$ compare
  5. 8 Pakistan 84.45 million current US$ compare
  6. 9 Brazil 77.55 million current US$ compare
  7. 10 Bangladesh 71.96 million current US$ compare

See the full ranking of 216 places →

More aid effectiveness data for Least developed countries

All data for Least developed countries →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Least developed countries?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Least developed countries was 1.48 billion current US$ in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Least developed countries?
The highest recorded value was 3.81 billion current US$ in 2015.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Least developed countries?
The lowest recorded value was 57.87 million current US$ in 1970.
How does Least developed countries rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
Least developed countries ranks 7th out of 45 groups with data for 2022.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) rising or falling in Least developed countries?
Over the last ten years it is down 51.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Least developed countries data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Least developed countries. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-gaps-filled/least-developed-countries-un-classification/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-gaps-filled/least-developed-countries-un-classification/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Least developed countries</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) with 238 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 10,301 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) with 238 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.