Eswatini vs Korea, Democratic People's Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)

Eswatini
165,318 current US$
in 2023
Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
185,326 current US$
in 2021
Eswatini rank
124th
Korea, Democratic People's Republic of rank
121st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
-20.0M-10.0M010.0M196019912023

How they compare

Korea, Democratic People's Republic of currently reports 185,326 current US$ against 165,318 current US$ in Eswatini, a difference of 20,008 current US$.

That makes Korea, Democratic People's Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 124th and Korea, Democratic People's Republic of ranks 121st of 169 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Korea, Democratic People's Republic of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 1.99 million current US$ 548,000 current US$ 1.44 million current US$ Eswatini
2000s -1.36 million current US$ 1.29 million current US$ 2.65 million current US$ Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
2010s 1.27 million current US$ 685,095 current US$ 587,092 current US$ Eswatini
2020s 547,754 current US$ 232,538 current US$ 315,217 current US$ Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), Eswatini or Korea, Democratic People's Republic of?
Korea, Democratic People's Republic of, at 185,326 current US$ against 165,318 current US$ in Eswatini as of 2021.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between Eswatini and Korea, Democratic People's Republic of?
20,008 current US$, with Korea, Democratic People's Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Korea, Democratic People's Republic of?
27 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2021.
How do Eswatini and Korea, Democratic People's Republic of rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
Eswatini ranks 124th and Korea, Democratic People's Republic of ranks 121st of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Korea, Democratic People's Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-gaps-filled/eswatini/korea-dem-people-s-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-gaps-filled/eswatini/korea-dem-people-s-rep/">Eswatini vs Korea, Democratic People&#x27;s Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 10,301 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) with 238 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.