Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Eswatini
Eswatini: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) was 165,318 current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Eswatini, 1960–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Eswatini stood at 165,318 current US$.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.4% on the previous year and down 91.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Eswatini peaked at 14.99 million current US$ in 1965 and was at its lowest, -16.13 million current US$, in 1989.
That places Eswatini 124th out of 169 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Eswatini, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 8.49 million current US$ | — |
| 1961 | 11.43 million current US$ | +34.6% |
| 1962 | 5.02 million current US$ | -56.1% |
| 1963 | 5.51 million current US$ | +9.8% |
| 1964 | 12.42 million current US$ | +125.4% |
| 1965 | 14.99 million current US$ | +20.7% |
| 1966 | 10.12 million current US$ | -32.5% |
| 1967 | 8.89 million current US$ | -12.2% |
| 1968 | 7.20 million current US$ | -19.0% |
| 1969 | 9.01 million current US$ | +25.1% |
| 1970 | 3.67 million current US$ | -59.3% |
| 1971 | -800,000 current US$ | -121.8% |
| 1972 | 2.30 million current US$ | -387.5% |
| 1973 | 4.78 million current US$ | +107.8% |
| 1974 | 7.26 million current US$ | +51.9% |
| 1975 | 2.81 million current US$ | -61.3% |
| 1976 | 2.83 million current US$ | +0.7% |
| 1977 | 13.51 million current US$ | +377.4% |
| 1978 | 12.28 million current US$ | -9.1% |
| 1979 | 12.71 million current US$ | +3.5% |
| 1980 | 13.51 million current US$ | +6.3% |
| 1981 | 6.77 million current US$ | -49.9% |
| 1982 | 4.29 million current US$ | -36.6% |
| 1983 | 2.62 million current US$ | -38.9% |
| 1984 | 1.83 million current US$ | -30.2% |
| 1985 | 760,000 current US$ | -58.5% |
| 1986 | 3.39 million current US$ | +346.1% |
| 1987 | 2.03 million current US$ | -40.1% |
| 1988 | -2.47 million current US$ | -221.7% |
| 1989 | -16.13 million current US$ | +553.0% |
| 1990 | 3.10 million current US$ | -119.2% |
| 1991 | 2.84 million current US$ | -8.4% |
| 1992 | 3.38 million current US$ | +19.0% |
| 1993 | 9.48 million current US$ | +180.5% |
| 1994 | 2.20 million current US$ | -76.8% |
| 1995 | 5.28 million current US$ | +140.0% |
| 1996 | -6.63 million current US$ | -225.6% |
| 1997 | 3.18 million current US$ | -148.0% |
| 1998 | 4.31 million current US$ | +35.5% |
| 1999 | 6.24 million current US$ | +44.8% |
| 2000 | -3.70 million current US$ | -159.3% |
| 2001 | -3.20 million current US$ | -13.5% |
| 2002 | -1.40 million current US$ | -56.2% |
| 2003 | 1.39 million current US$ | -199.3% |
| 2004 | 1.43 million current US$ | +2.9% |
| 2005 | -9.33 million current US$ | -752.4% |
| 2006 | 240,000 current US$ | -102.6% |
| 2007 | 2.23 million current US$ | +829.2% |
| 2008 | 2.49 million current US$ | +11.7% |
| 2009 | -3.79 million current US$ | -252.2% |
| 2010 | 20,000 current US$ | -100.5% |
| 2011 | 30,000 current US$ | +50.0% |
| 2012 | 7.66 million current US$ | +25433.3% |
| 2013 | 2.01 million current US$ | -73.7% |
| 2014 | 1.57 million current US$ | -22.1% |
| 2015 | 258,304 current US$ | -83.5% |
| 2016 | 5,918 current US$ | -97.7% |
| 2017 | 391,522 current US$ | +6515.8% |
| 2018 | 374,336 current US$ | -4.4% |
| 2019 | 401,674 current US$ | +7.3% |
| 2020 | 546,681 current US$ | +36.1% |
| 2021 | 548,828 current US$ | +0.4% |
| 2022 | 161,389 current US$ | -70.6% |
| 2023 | 165,318 current US$ | +2.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9.31 million current US$ | 5.02 million current US$ | 14.99 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1970s | 6.13 million current US$ | -800,000 current US$ | 13.51 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.66 million current US$ | -16.13 million current US$ | 13.51 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 3.34 million current US$ | -6.63 million current US$ | 9.48 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | -1.36 million current US$ | -9.33 million current US$ | 2.49 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.27 million current US$ | 5,918 current US$ | 7.66 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 355,554 current US$ | 161,389 current US$ | 548,828 current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Eswatini
- 121 Korea, Democratic People's Republic of 185,326 current US$ compare
- 122 Bhutan 182,915 current US$ compare
- 123 Iran, Islamic Republic of 166,563 current US$ compare
- 125 Saint Lucia 140,890 current US$ compare
- 126 Lao People's Democratic Republic 135,203 current US$ compare
- 127 Antigua and Barbuda 125,527 current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for Eswatini
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 24,761 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1,889 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 585,648 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 13.45 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 912,632 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 178,216 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 7.79 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 165,318 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy -567,147 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -415,180 current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Eswatini?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Eswatini was 165,318 current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Eswatini?
- The highest recorded value was 14.99 million current US$ in 1965.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Eswatini?
- The lowest recorded value was -16.13 million current US$ in 1989.
- How does Eswatini rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
- Eswatini ranks 124th out of 169 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) rising or falling in Eswatini?
- Over the last ten years it is down 91.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Eswatini data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) with 238 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) with 238 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.