Eswatini vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)

Eswatini
165,318 current US$
in 2023
Lao People's Democratic Republic
135,203 current US$
in 2023
Eswatini rank
124th
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
126th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
-20.0M-10.0M010.0M196019912023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 165,318 current US$ against 135,203 current US$ in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 30,115 current US$.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Lao People's Democratic Republic's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 124th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 126th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 4 and Lao People's Democratic Republic in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Lao People's Democratic Republic Difference Ahead
1960s 9.31 million current US$ 2.41 million current US$ 6.89 million current US$ Eswatini
1970s 6.13 million current US$ 1.47 million current US$ 4.66 million current US$ Eswatini
1980s 1.66 million current US$ 56,500 current US$ 1.60 million current US$ Eswatini
1990s 3.34 million current US$ 597,000 current US$ 2.74 million current US$ Eswatini
2000s -1.36 million current US$ 812,000 current US$ 2.18 million current US$ Lao People's Democratic Republic
2010s 1.27 million current US$ 1.50 million current US$ 231,398 current US$ Lao People's Democratic Republic
2020s 355,554 current US$ 1.08 million current US$ 724,686 current US$ Lao People's Democratic Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), Eswatini or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
Eswatini, at 165,318 current US$ against 135,203 current US$ in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between Eswatini and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
30,115 current US$, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
64 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
Eswatini ranks 124th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 126th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-gaps-filled/eswatini/lao-pdr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-gaps-filled/eswatini/lao-pdr/">Eswatini vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 10,301 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) with 238 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.