Barbados vs Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)

Barbados
186.05 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Sri Lanka
154.7 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
35th
Sri Lanka rank
38th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time

  • Barbados
  • Sri Lanka
-2.5k02.5k5.0k7.5k196219922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 186.05 current US$ per square kilometre against 154.7 current US$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, a difference of 31.35 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.2 times Sri Lanka's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 35th and Sri Lanka ranks 38th of 168 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 1,465 current US$ per square kilometre 145.23 current US$ per square kilometre 1,320 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 3,121 current US$ per square kilometre 154.12 current US$ per square kilometre 2,967 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 660.46 current US$ per square kilometre 569.26 current US$ per square kilometre 91.21 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 1,133 current US$ per square kilometre 236.41 current US$ per square kilometre 896.15 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 1,814 current US$ per square kilometre 176.45 current US$ per square kilometre 1,638 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 186.05 current US$ per square kilometre -135.54 current US$ per square kilometre 321.59 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), Barbados or Sri Lanka?
Barbados, at 186.05 current US$ per square kilometre against 154.7 current US$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka as of 2010.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between Barbados and Sri Lanka?
31.35 current US$ per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Sri Lanka?
45 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2010.
How do Barbados and Sri Lanka rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
Barbados ranks 35th and Sri Lanka ranks 38th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/sri-lanka/">Barbados vs Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 9,882 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.