Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) was 154.7 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
154.7 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 69.5%
World rank
38th
of 168 countries
All-time high
1,168 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1980
All-time low
-135.54 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Years of data
62
1962–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Sri Lanka, 1962–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Sri Lanka is 154.7 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of up 69.5% on the previous year and down 33.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Sri Lanka peaked at 1,168 current US$ per square kilometre in 1980 and was at its lowest, -135.54 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2010.
That places Sri Lanka 38th out of 168 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Sri Lanka, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | 33.17 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 32.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 1964 | 22.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.4% |
| 1965 | -3.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -118.1% |
| 1966 | 104.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -2732.0% |
| 1967 | 175.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +67.5% |
| 1968 | 137.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.6% |
| 1969 | 162.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.9% |
| 1970 | 164.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1971 | 220.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.0% |
| 1972 | 132.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.0% |
| 1973 | 62.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.4% |
| 1974 | 33.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.3% |
| 1975 | 66.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +99.0% |
| 1976 | 129.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +95.4% |
| 1977 | 81.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.1% |
| 1978 | 237.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +192.1% |
| 1979 | 414.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +74.7% |
| 1980 | 1,168 current US$ per square kilometre | +181.9% |
| 1981 | 803.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.2% |
| 1982 | 884.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.1% |
| 1983 | 674.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.8% |
| 1984 | 452.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.9% |
| 1985 | 195.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.8% |
| 1986 | 275.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.1% |
| 1987 | 259.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.8% |
| 1988 | 484.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +86.7% |
| 1989 | 492.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1990 | 340.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.0% |
| 1991 | 327.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.6% |
| 1992 | 259.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.9% |
| 1993 | 186.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.9% |
| 1994 | 197.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 1995 | 216.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 1996 | 192.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.7% |
| 1997 | 278.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.1% |
| 1998 | 216.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.0% |
| 1999 | 148.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.5% |
| 2000 | 157.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2001 | 239.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.0% |
| 2002 | 122.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.9% |
| 2003 | 147.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.7% |
| 2004 | 268.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +81.4% |
| 2005 | 218.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.4% |
| 2006 | 109.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 2007 | 183.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +67.6% |
| 2008 | 27.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -84.8% |
| 2009 | 289.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +937.1% |
| 2010 | -135.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -146.8% |
| 2011 | 67.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -149.6% |
| 2012 | 137.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +105.0% |
| 2013 | 230.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +67.3% |
| 2014 | 137.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.4% |
| 2015 | 607.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +341.9% |
| 2016 | 119.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -80.3% |
| 2017 | 118.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 2018 | 182.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.0% |
| 2019 | 183.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 2020 | 200.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 2021 | 190.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 2022 | 91.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.2% |
| 2023 | 154.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 83.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 175.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 1970s | 154.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 33.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 414.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 569.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 195.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,168 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 236.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 148.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 340.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 176.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 27.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 289.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 164.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -135.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 607.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 159.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 91.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 200.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Sri Lanka
- 35 Barbados 186.05 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 North Macedonia 183.04 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 Uganda 157.69 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Nigeria 136.13 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Comoros 124.26 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Hong Kong 114.29 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Sri Lanka
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 743,046 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 104,629 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 10.44 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 28.32 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 3.69 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 26.12 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 5.01 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 9.57 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 441,093 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 76.61 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Sri Lanka?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Sri Lanka was 154.7 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Sri Lanka?
- The highest recorded value was 1,168 current US$ per square kilometre in 1980.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Sri Lanka?
- The lowest recorded value was -135.54 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010.
- How does Sri Lanka rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
- Sri Lanka ranks 38th out of 168 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) rising or falling in Sri Lanka?
- Over the last ten years it is down 33.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Sri Lanka data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.