Hong Kong, China vs Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)

Hong Kong, China
114.29 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1996
Sri Lanka
154.7 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China rank
41st
Sri Lanka rank
38th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Sri Lanka
-80.0k-60.0k-40.0k-20.0k0196119922023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 154.7 current US$ per square kilometre against 114.29 current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 40.41 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.4 times Hong Kong, China's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 41st and Sri Lanka ranks 38th of 168 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 2 and Sri Lanka in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 109.07 current US$ per square kilometre 83.08 current US$ per square kilometre 25.99 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1970s 370.88 current US$ per square kilometre 154.12 current US$ per square kilometre 216.75 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1980s 191.44 current US$ per square kilometre 569.26 current US$ per square kilometre 377.81 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1990s -11,162 current US$ per square kilometre 245.78 current US$ per square kilometre 11,408 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), Hong Kong, China or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 154.7 current US$ per square kilometre against 114.29 current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between Hong Kong, China and Sri Lanka?
40.41 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Sri Lanka?
35 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 1996.
How do Hong Kong, China and Sri Lanka rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
Hong Kong, China ranks 41st and Sri Lanka ranks 38th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/sri-lanka/">Hong Kong, China vs Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 9,882 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.