Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Hong Kong, China
Hong Kong, China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) was 114.29 current US$ per square kilometre in 1996. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Hong Kong, China, 1961–1996
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Hong Kong, China is 114.29 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 1996.
That represents a change of down 72.1% on the previous year and down 61.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Hong Kong, China peaked at 2,637 current US$ per square kilometre in 1971 and was at its lowest, -78,273 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1992.
That places Hong Kong, China 41st out of 168 countries with data for 1996, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Hong Kong, China, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | -88.24 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | -196.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +122.2% |
| 1963 | -68.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.0% |
| 1964 | -49.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.6% |
| 1965 | -264.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +440.0% |
| 1966 | 539.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -303.7% |
| 1967 | 960.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +78.2% |
| 1968 | 127.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -86.7% |
| 1969 | -176.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -238.5% |
| 1970 | 88.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -150.0% |
| 1971 | 2,637 current US$ per square kilometre | +2888.9% |
| 1972 | 1,951 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.0% |
| 1973 | -529.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -127.1% |
| 1974 | -431.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.5% |
| 1975 | -1,604 current US$ per square kilometre | +271.8% |
| 1976 | 297.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -118.5% |
| 1977 | 770 current US$ per square kilometre | +159.2% |
| 1978 | 480 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.7% |
| 1979 | 50 current US$ per square kilometre | -89.6% |
| 1980 | 540 current US$ per square kilometre | +980.0% |
| 1981 | -70 current US$ per square kilometre | -113.0% |
| 1982 | -141.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +102.0% |
| 1983 | -111.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.4% |
| 1984 | -262.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +136.4% |
| 1985 | 404.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -253.8% |
| 1986 | 292.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.5% |
| 1987 | 363.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.1% |
| 1988 | 494.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.1% |
| 1989 | 404.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.4% |
| 1990 | 545.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.0% |
| 1991 | -2,040 current US$ per square kilometre | -474.1% |
| 1992 | -78,273 current US$ per square kilometre | +3736.1% |
| 1993 | 606.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.8% |
| 1994 | 505.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.7% |
| 1995 | 409.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.9% |
| 1996 | 114.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -72.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 87.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -264.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 960.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 370.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -1,604 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,637 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 191.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -262.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 540 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | -11,162 current US$ per square kilometre | -78,273 current US$ per square kilometre | 606.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 7 |
Countries ranked near Hong Kong, China
- 38 Sri Lanka 154.7 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Nigeria 136.13 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Comoros 124.26 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 Pakistan 109.55 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 43 South Sudan 108.62 current US$ per square kilometre
- 44 Kenya 103.47 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Hong Kong, China
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 70,000 current US$ (1996)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 50,000 current US$ (1996)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 10,000 current US$ (1992)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 800,000 current US$ (1996)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 30,000 current US$ (1996)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1.57 million current US$ (1996)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 2.06 million current US$ (1996)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 120,000 current US$ (1996)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 50,000 current US$ (1996)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 5.86 million current US$ (1996)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Hong Kong, China?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Hong Kong, China was 114.29 current US$ per square kilometre in 1996, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Hong Kong, China?
- The highest recorded value was 2,637 current US$ per square kilometre in 1971.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Hong Kong, China?
- The lowest recorded value was -78,273 current US$ per square kilometre in 1992.
- How does Hong Kong, China rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 41st out of 168 countries with data for 1996.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) rising or falling in Hong Kong, China?
- Over the last ten years it is down 61.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Hong Kong, China data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 36 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.