Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Pakistan
Pakistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) was 109.55 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
109.55 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 18.4%
World rank
42nd
of 168 countries
All-time high
809.93 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2016
All-time low
13.97 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1973
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Pakistan, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Pakistan stood at 109.55 current US$ per square kilometre.
The figure is up 18.4% on the previous year and down 84.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Pakistan peaked at 809.93 current US$ per square kilometre in 2016 and was at its lowest, 13.97 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1973.
Pakistan ranks 42nd of 168 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Pakistan, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 14.75 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 23.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.4% |
| 1963 | 34.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.0% |
| 1964 | 36.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 1965 | 36.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 1966 | 31.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.9% |
| 1967 | 35.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.2% |
| 1968 | 22.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.5% |
| 1969 | 30.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.6% |
| 1970 | 27.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.7% |
| 1971 | 23.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.5% |
| 1972 | 23.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 1973 | 13.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.7% |
| 1974 | 18.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.1% |
| 1975 | 18.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1976 | 19.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1977 | 32.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +64.6% |
| 1978 | 38.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.4% |
| 1979 | 62.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.1% |
| 1980 | 56.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.2% |
| 1981 | 55.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 1982 | 33.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.1% |
| 1983 | 23.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.3% |
| 1984 | 23.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 1985 | 19.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.5% |
| 1986 | 30.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.6% |
| 1987 | 38.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.7% |
| 1988 | 43.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.3% |
| 1989 | 53.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.5% |
| 1990 | 70.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.5% |
| 1991 | 52.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.5% |
| 1992 | 42.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.5% |
| 1993 | 40.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.2% |
| 1994 | 47.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.5% |
| 1995 | 68.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.5% |
| 1996 | 79.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.6% |
| 1997 | 55.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.7% |
| 1998 | 60.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 1999 | 51.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.8% |
| 2000 | 30.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.9% |
| 2001 | 35.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.5% |
| 2002 | 86.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +144.2% |
| 2003 | 145.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +67.6% |
| 2004 | 117.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.0% |
| 2005 | 81.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.5% |
| 2006 | 263.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +221.9% |
| 2007 | 256.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 2008 | 337.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.6% |
| 2009 | 282.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.4% |
| 2010 | 387.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.2% |
| 2011 | 430.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 2012 | 389 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.6% |
| 2013 | 685.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +76.3% |
| 2014 | 568.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.1% |
| 2015 | 740.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.2% |
| 2016 | 809.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.3% |
| 2017 | 672.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.0% |
| 2018 | 572.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.8% |
| 2019 | 504.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.8% |
| 2020 | 332.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.1% |
| 2021 | 227.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.5% |
| 2022 | 92.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -59.4% |
| 2023 | 109.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 29.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 36.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 27.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 62.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 37.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 19.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 56.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 56.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 40.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 79.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 163.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 30.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 337.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 576.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 387.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 809.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 190.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 92.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 332.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Pakistan
- 39 Nigeria 136.13 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Comoros 124.26 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Hong Kong 114.29 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 43 South Sudan 108.62 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 44 Kenya 103.47 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 45 Zimbabwe 93.71 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Pakistan
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 7.92 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 28,763 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 31.21 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 102.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 2.31 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany -14.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 19.96 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 84.45 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 13.81 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -138.02 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Pakistan?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Pakistan was 109.55 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Pakistan?
- The highest recorded value was 809.93 current US$ per square kilometre in 2016.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Pakistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 13.97 current US$ per square kilometre in 1973.
- How does Pakistan rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
- Pakistan ranks 42nd out of 168 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) rising or falling in Pakistan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 84.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Pakistan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.