Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) was 93.71 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
93.71 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 22.2%
World rank
45th
of 168 countries
All-time high
568.75 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2012
All-time low
0.0258 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
62
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Zimbabwe, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Zimbabwe stood at 93.71 current US$ per square kilometre.
That represents a change of down 22.2% on the previous year and down 75.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Zimbabwe peaked at 568.75 current US$ per square kilometre in 2012 and was at its lowest, 0.0258 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Zimbabwe 45th out of 168 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Zimbabwe, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0258 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 27.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +107799.9% |
| 1964 | 10.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -60.7% |
| 1965 | 8.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.6% |
| 1966 | 0.2843 current US$ per square kilometre | -96.6% |
| 1967 | 0.517 current US$ per square kilometre | +81.8% |
| 1968 | 0.6462 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 1969 | 0.9047 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.0% |
| 1970 | 0.9823 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 1971 | 0.9306 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 1972 | 1.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 1973 | 1.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.5% |
| 1974 | 1.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.4% |
| 1975 | 6.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +270.1% |
| 1976 | 10.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +68.1% |
| 1977 | 11.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 1978 | 17.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.7% |
| 1979 | 27.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.8% |
| 1980 | 123.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +343.9% |
| 1981 | 88.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.0% |
| 1982 | 96.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 1983 | 55.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.2% |
| 1984 | 43.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.5% |
| 1985 | 63.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.4% |
| 1986 | 39.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.7% |
| 1987 | 42.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 1988 | 78.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +85.9% |
| 1989 | 55.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.1% |
| 1990 | 60.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.8% |
| 1991 | 194.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +220.6% |
| 1992 | 195.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 1993 | 50.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -74.3% |
| 1994 | 97.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +94.6% |
| 1995 | 118.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.3% |
| 1996 | 65.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.0% |
| 1997 | 57.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.0% |
| 1998 | 94.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +65.4% |
| 1999 | 68.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.3% |
| 2000 | 52.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.2% |
| 2001 | 46.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.7% |
| 2002 | 74.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.9% |
| 2003 | 152.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +105.1% |
| 2004 | 128.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.7% |
| 2005 | 117.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.4% |
| 2006 | 180.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.6% |
| 2007 | 243.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.7% |
| 2008 | 230.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.2% |
| 2009 | 283.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.1% |
| 2010 | 279.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 2011 | 200.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.2% |
| 2012 | 568.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +183.8% |
| 2013 | 379.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.3% |
| 2014 | 442.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 2015 | 366.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.1% |
| 2016 | 347.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.2% |
| 2017 | 311.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 2018 | 323.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2019 | 326.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2020 | 324.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 2021 | 181.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.1% |
| 2022 | 120.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.5% |
| 2023 | 93.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0258 current US$ per square kilometre | 27.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 1970s | 7.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.9306 current US$ per square kilometre | 27.81 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 68.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 39.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 123.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 100.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 50.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 195.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 151 current US$ per square kilometre | 46.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 283.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 354.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 200.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 568.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 179.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 93.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 324.27 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Zimbabwe
- 42 Pakistan 109.55 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 43 South Sudan 108.62 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 44 Kenya 103.47 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 46 Tonga 90.79 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 47 Georgia 90.26 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 48 Montenegro 88.07 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Zimbabwe
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 75,834 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 331,066 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 7.24 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 35.67 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 9.72 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 17.35 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 6.26 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 36.25 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 575,259 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 12.78 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Zimbabwe?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Zimbabwe was 93.71 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The highest recorded value was 568.75 current US$ per square kilometre in 2012.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0258 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Zimbabwe rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
- Zimbabwe ranks 45th out of 168 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
- Over the last ten years it is down 75.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.