Tonga vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)

Tonga
90.79 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
93.71 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tonga rank
46th
Zimbabwe rank
45th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time

  • Tonga
  • Zimbabwe
01.0k2.0k3.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 93.71 current US$ per square kilometre against 90.79 current US$ per square kilometre in Tonga, a difference of 2.92 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Tonga ahead.

Tonga ranks 46th and Zimbabwe ranks 45th of 168 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Tonga averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tonga Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 688.89 current US$ per square kilometre 2.15 current US$ per square kilometre 686.74 current US$ per square kilometre Tonga
1970s 1,019 current US$ per square kilometre 7.99 current US$ per square kilometre 1,011 current US$ per square kilometre Tonga
1980s 927.78 current US$ per square kilometre 68.74 current US$ per square kilometre 859.04 current US$ per square kilometre Tonga
1990s 120.37 current US$ per square kilometre 119.43 current US$ per square kilometre 0.9443 current US$ per square kilometre Tonga
2000s 354.17 current US$ per square kilometre 257.33 current US$ per square kilometre 96.83 current US$ per square kilometre Tonga
2010s 70.26 current US$ per square kilometre 355.43 current US$ per square kilometre 285.18 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 151.19 current US$ per square kilometre 179.93 current US$ per square kilometre 28.73 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), Tonga or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 93.71 current US$ per square kilometre against 90.79 current US$ per square kilometre in Tonga as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between Tonga and Zimbabwe?
2.92 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tonga and Zimbabwe?
46 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Tonga and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
Tonga ranks 46th and Zimbabwe ranks 45th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tonga vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/tonga/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/tonga/zimbabwe/">Tonga vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 9,882 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.