Central Europe and the Baltics vs Pakistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)

Central Europe and the Baltics
0.951 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Pakistan
109.55 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
43rd
Pakistan rank
42nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Pakistan
0200400600800196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 109.55 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.951 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 108.6 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 115.2 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Central Europe and the Baltics ahead.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 43rd and Pakistan ranks 42nd of 45 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Central Europe and the Baltics averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Pakistan Difference Ahead
1990s 57.34 current US$ per square kilometre 56.89 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4515 current US$ per square kilometre Central Europe and the Baltics
2000s 10.78 current US$ per square kilometre 163.83 current US$ per square kilometre 153.04 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 0.951 current US$ per square kilometre 387.23 current US$ per square kilometre 386.28 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), Central Europe and the Baltics or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 109.55 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.951 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between Central Europe and the Baltics and Pakistan?
108.6 current US$ per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Pakistan?
21 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2010.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Pakistan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 43rd and Pakistan ranks 42nd of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Pakistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/pakistan/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Pakistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 9,882 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.