Central Europe and the Baltics vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)

Central Europe and the Baltics
0.951 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Zimbabwe
93.71 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
43rd
Zimbabwe rank
45th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Zimbabwe
0200400600196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 93.71 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.951 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 92.76 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 98.5 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Central Europe and the Baltics ahead.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 43rd and Zimbabwe ranks 45th of 45 groups.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 57.34 current US$ per square kilometre 100.23 current US$ per square kilometre 42.89 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 10.78 current US$ per square kilometre 151 current US$ per square kilometre 140.21 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.951 current US$ per square kilometre 279.2 current US$ per square kilometre 278.25 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), Central Europe and the Baltics or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 93.71 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.951 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between Central Europe and the Baltics and Zimbabwe?
92.76 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Zimbabwe?
21 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2010.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 43rd and Zimbabwe ranks 45th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/zimbabwe/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 9,882 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.