Hong Kong, China vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)

Hong Kong, China
114.29 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1996
OECD members
3.07 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Hong Kong, China rank
41st
OECD members rank
42nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • OECD members
-80.0k-60.0k-40.0k-20.0k0196119912022

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 114.29 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.07 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 111.22 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 37.2 times OECD members's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 41st and OECD members ranks 42nd of 168 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 2 and OECD members in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China OECD members Difference Ahead
1970s 370.88 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1962 current US$ per square kilometre 370.68 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1980s 191.44 current US$ per square kilometre 0.5402 current US$ per square kilometre 190.9 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1990s -11,162 current US$ per square kilometre 1.98 current US$ per square kilometre 11,164 current US$ per square kilometre OECD members

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), Hong Kong, China or OECD members?
Hong Kong, China, at 114.29 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.07 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 1996.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between Hong Kong, China and OECD members?
111.22 current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and OECD members?
27 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 1996.
How do Hong Kong, China and OECD members rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
Hong Kong, China ranks 41st and OECD members ranks 42nd of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/oecd-members/">Hong Kong, China vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 9,882 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.