OECD members vs Pakistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)

OECD members
3.07 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Pakistan
109.55 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members rank
42nd
Pakistan rank
42nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time

  • OECD members
  • Pakistan
0200400600800196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 109.55 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.07 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 106.48 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 35.6 times OECD members's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.

OECD members ranks 42nd and Pakistan ranks 42nd of 45 groups.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD members Pakistan Difference Ahead
1970s 0.1962 current US$ per square kilometre 27.95 current US$ per square kilometre 27.76 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1980s 0.5402 current US$ per square kilometre 37.78 current US$ per square kilometre 37.24 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1990s 1.83 current US$ per square kilometre 56.89 current US$ per square kilometre 55.05 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2000s 0.3003 current US$ per square kilometre 163.83 current US$ per square kilometre 163.53 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 2.85 current US$ per square kilometre 576.18 current US$ per square kilometre 573.33 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s 4.28 current US$ per square kilometre 217.74 current US$ per square kilometre 213.45 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), OECD members or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 109.55 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.07 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between OECD members and Pakistan?
106.48 current US$ per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and Pakistan?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do OECD members and Pakistan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
OECD members ranks 42nd and Pakistan ranks 42nd of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD members vs Pakistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/pakistan/">OECD members vs Pakistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 9,882 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.