OECD members vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)

OECD members
3.07 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Zimbabwe
93.71 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members rank
42nd
Zimbabwe rank
45th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time

  • OECD members
  • Zimbabwe
0200400600196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 93.71 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.07 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 90.64 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 30.5 times OECD members's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

OECD members ranks 42nd and Zimbabwe ranks 45th of 45 groups.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD members Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 0.1962 current US$ per square kilometre 7.99 current US$ per square kilometre 7.79 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0.5402 current US$ per square kilometre 68.74 current US$ per square kilometre 68.2 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 1.83 current US$ per square kilometre 100.23 current US$ per square kilometre 98.39 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.3003 current US$ per square kilometre 151 current US$ per square kilometre 150.7 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 2.85 current US$ per square kilometre 354.69 current US$ per square kilometre 351.84 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 4.28 current US$ per square kilometre 208.66 current US$ per square kilometre 204.38 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), OECD members or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 93.71 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.07 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between OECD members and Zimbabwe?
90.64 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and Zimbabwe?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do OECD members and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
OECD members ranks 42nd and Zimbabwe ranks 45th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD members vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/zimbabwe/">OECD members vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 9,882 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.