Democratic Republic of Congo vs Jordan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)

Democratic Republic of Congo
1.22 billion current US$
in 2023
Jordan
1.25 billion current US$
in 2023
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
5th
Jordan rank
4th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Jordan
0500.0M1.0B1.5B196019912023

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 1.25 billion current US$ against 1.22 billion current US$ in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 30.18 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 24 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jordan ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 5th and Jordan ranks 4th of 164 countries.

Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Jordan Difference Ahead
1960s 30.91 million current US$ 38.06 million current US$ 7.15 million current US$ Jordan
1970s 15.40 million current US$ 59.10 million current US$ 43.70 million current US$ Jordan
1980s 26.90 million current US$ 46.00 million current US$ 19.10 million current US$ Jordan
1990s 13.00 million current US$ 76.31 million current US$ 63.31 million current US$ Jordan
2000s 326.79 million current US$ 367.39 million current US$ 40.59 million current US$ Jordan
2010s 519.81 million current US$ 788.77 million current US$ 268.95 million current US$ Jordan
2020s 874.35 million current US$ 1.01 billion current US$ 139.85 million current US$ Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), Democratic Republic of Congo or Jordan?
Jordan, at 1.25 billion current US$ against 1.22 billion current US$ in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between Democratic Republic of Congo and Jordan?
30.18 million current US$, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Jordan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Jordan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 5th and Jordan ranks 4th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Jordan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-gaps-filled/congo-dem-rep/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-gaps-filled/congo-dem-rep/jordan/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Jordan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 9,809 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) with 200 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.