Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Democratic Republic of Congo
Democratic Republic of Congo: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) was 1.22 billion current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Democratic Republic of Congo, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
Democratic Republic of Congo recorded 1.22 billion current US$ for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in 2023.
The figure is up 104.2% on the previous year and up 284.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Democratic Republic of Congo peaked at 1.42 billion current US$ in 2003 and was at its lowest, 130,000 current US$, in 1998.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 5th of 164 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Democratic Republic of Congo, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 3.00 million current US$ | — |
| 1962 | 64.00 million current US$ | +2033.3% |
| 1963 | 36.00 million current US$ | -43.8% |
| 1964 | 38.00 million current US$ | +5.6% |
| 1965 | 44.84 million current US$ | +18.0% |
| 1966 | 32.17 million current US$ | -28.3% |
| 1967 | 30.75 million current US$ | -4.4% |
| 1968 | 17.41 million current US$ | -43.4% |
| 1969 | 12.00 million current US$ | -31.1% |
| 1970 | 11.00 million current US$ | -8.3% |
| 1971 | 12.00 million current US$ | +9.1% |
| 1972 | 9.00 million current US$ | -25.0% |
| 1973 | 4.00 million current US$ | -55.6% |
| 1974 | 8.00 million current US$ | +100.0% |
| 1975 | 4.00 million current US$ | -50.0% |
| 1976 | 17.00 million current US$ | +325.0% |
| 1977 | 24.00 million current US$ | +41.2% |
| 1978 | 21.00 million current US$ | -12.5% |
| 1979 | 44.00 million current US$ | +109.5% |
| 1980 | 11.00 million current US$ | -75.0% |
| 1981 | 21.00 million current US$ | +90.9% |
| 1982 | 16.00 million current US$ | -23.8% |
| 1983 | 23.00 million current US$ | +43.8% |
| 1984 | 8.00 million current US$ | -65.2% |
| 1985 | 38.00 million current US$ | +375.0% |
| 1986 | 23.00 million current US$ | -39.5% |
| 1987 | 40.00 million current US$ | +73.9% |
| 1988 | 36.00 million current US$ | -10.0% |
| 1989 | 53.00 million current US$ | +47.2% |
| 1990 | 32.00 million current US$ | -39.6% |
| 1991 | 42.00 million current US$ | +31.2% |
| 1992 | 34.00 million current US$ | -19.0% |
| 1993 | 8.00 million current US$ | -76.5% |
| 1994 | 1.00 million current US$ | -87.5% |
| 1995 | 782,500 current US$ | -21.8% |
| 1996 | 565,000 current US$ | -27.8% |
| 1997 | 347,500 current US$ | -38.5% |
| 1998 | 130,000 current US$ | -62.6% |
| 1999 | 11.17 million current US$ | +8492.3% |
| 2000 | 12.75 million current US$ | +14.1% |
| 2001 | 20.23 million current US$ | +58.7% |
| 2002 | 79.99 million current US$ | +295.4% |
| 2003 | 1.42 billion current US$ | +1669.5% |
| 2004 | 189.63 million current US$ | -86.6% |
| 2005 | 143.64 million current US$ | -24.3% |
| 2006 | 838.47 million current US$ | +483.7% |
| 2007 | 132.44 million current US$ | -84.2% |
| 2008 | 196.63 million current US$ | +48.5% |
| 2009 | 238.69 million current US$ | +21.4% |
| 2010 | 272.46 million current US$ | +14.1% |
| 2011 | 1.28 billion current US$ | +371.1% |
| 2012 | 279.46 million current US$ | -78.2% |
| 2013 | 317.84 million current US$ | +13.7% |
| 2014 | 385.06 million current US$ | +21.1% |
| 2015 | 769.23 million current US$ | +99.8% |
| 2016 | 337.18 million current US$ | -56.2% |
| 2017 | 442.08 million current US$ | +31.1% |
| 2018 | 464.98 million current US$ | +5.2% |
| 2019 | 646.16 million current US$ | +39.0% |
| 2020 | 778.09 million current US$ | +20.4% |
| 2021 | 898.86 million current US$ | +15.5% |
| 2022 | 598.40 million current US$ | -33.4% |
| 2023 | 1.22 billion current US$ | +104.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 30.91 million current US$ | 3.00 million current US$ | 64.00 million current US$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 15.40 million current US$ | 4.00 million current US$ | 44.00 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 26.90 million current US$ | 8.00 million current US$ | 53.00 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 13.00 million current US$ | 130,000 current US$ | 42.00 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 326.79 million current US$ | 12.75 million current US$ | 1.42 billion current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 519.81 million current US$ | 272.46 million current US$ | 1.28 billion current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 874.35 million current US$ | 598.40 million current US$ | 1.22 billion current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Democratic Republic of Congo
More aid effectiveness data for Democratic Republic of Congo
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 413,634 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 113.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 60.36 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 248.93 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 37.72 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 144.59 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 87.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 49.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 9.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 50.61 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Democratic Republic of Congo?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Democratic Republic of Congo was 1.22 billion current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in Democratic Republic of Congo?
- The highest recorded value was 1.42 billion current US$ in 2003.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in Democratic Republic of Congo?
- The lowest recorded value was 130,000 current US$ in 1998.
- How does Democratic Republic of Congo rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 5th out of 164 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) rising or falling in Democratic Republic of Congo?
- Over the last ten years it is up 284.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Democratic Republic of Congo data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) with 200 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) with 200 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.