Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Afghanistan
Afghanistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) was 1.18 billion current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Afghanistan, 1960–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
Afghanistan recorded 1.18 billion current US$ for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 9.1% on the previous year and down 30.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Afghanistan peaked at 3.05 billion current US$ in 2011 and was at its lowest, -7.00 million current US$, in 1981.
That places Afghanistan 6th out of 164 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Afghanistan, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 15.00 million current US$ | — |
| 1961 | 30.00 million current US$ | +100.0% |
| 1962 | 13.00 million current US$ | -56.7% |
| 1963 | 32.00 million current US$ | +146.2% |
| 1964 | 37.00 million current US$ | +15.6% |
| 1965 | 33.47 million current US$ | -9.5% |
| 1966 | 29.97 million current US$ | -10.5% |
| 1967 | 26.39 million current US$ | -11.9% |
| 1968 | 16.92 million current US$ | -35.9% |
| 1969 | 15.00 million current US$ | -11.3% |
| 1970 | 12.00 million current US$ | -20.0% |
| 1971 | 22.00 million current US$ | +83.3% |
| 1972 | 25.00 million current US$ | +13.6% |
| 1973 | 33.00 million current US$ | +32.0% |
| 1974 | 12.00 million current US$ | -63.6% |
| 1975 | 17.00 million current US$ | +41.7% |
| 1976 | 21.00 million current US$ | +23.5% |
| 1977 | 12.00 million current US$ | -42.9% |
| 1978 | 11.00 million current US$ | -8.3% |
| 1979 | 12.00 million current US$ | +9.1% |
| 1980 | 2.00 million current US$ | -83.3% |
| 1981 | -7.00 million current US$ | -450.0% |
| 1982 | -2.00 million current US$ | -71.4% |
| 1983 | -2.00 million current US$ | -0.0% |
| 1984 | -3.00 million current US$ | +50.0% |
| 1985 | -4.00 million current US$ | +33.3% |
| 1986 | -5.00 million current US$ | +25.0% |
| 1987 | 29.00 million current US$ | -680.0% |
| 1988 | 29.00 million current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 40.00 million current US$ | +37.9% |
| 1990 | 56.00 million current US$ | +40.0% |
| 1991 | 59.00 million current US$ | +5.4% |
| 1992 | 65.00 million current US$ | +10.2% |
| 1993 | 42.00 million current US$ | -35.4% |
| 1994 | 53.00 million current US$ | +26.2% |
| 1995 | 2.00 million current US$ | -96.2% |
| 1996 | 2.00 million current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 12.03 million current US$ | +501.3% |
| 1998 | 22.05 million current US$ | +83.4% |
| 1999 | 32.08 million current US$ | +45.5% |
| 2000 | 2.42 million current US$ | -92.5% |
| 2001 | 7.70 million current US$ | +218.2% |
| 2002 | 367.61 million current US$ | +4674.2% |
| 2003 | 485.79 million current US$ | +32.1% |
| 2004 | 778.29 million current US$ | +60.2% |
| 2005 | 1.32 billion current US$ | +69.4% |
| 2006 | 1.40 billion current US$ | +6.5% |
| 2007 | 1.51 billion current US$ | +7.9% |
| 2008 | 2.11 billion current US$ | +39.4% |
| 2009 | 2.98 billion current US$ | +41.1% |
| 2010 | 2.94 billion current US$ | -1.4% |
| 2011 | 3.05 billion current US$ | +4.0% |
| 2012 | 2.71 billion current US$ | -11.2% |
| 2013 | 1.69 billion current US$ | -37.6% |
| 2014 | 1.93 billion current US$ | +13.8% |
| 2015 | 1.63 billion current US$ | -15.4% |
| 2016 | 1.38 billion current US$ | -15.7% |
| 2017 | 1.22 billion current US$ | -11.7% |
| 2018 | 914.37 million current US$ | -24.8% |
| 2019 | 1.43 billion current US$ | +56.2% |
| 2020 | 1.01 billion current US$ | -29.3% |
| 2021 | 1.48 billion current US$ | +46.7% |
| 2022 | 1.30 billion current US$ | -12.5% |
| 2023 | 1.18 billion current US$ | -9.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 24.88 million current US$ | 13.00 million current US$ | 37.00 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1970s | 17.70 million current US$ | 11.00 million current US$ | 33.00 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 7.70 million current US$ | -7.00 million current US$ | 40.00 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 34.52 million current US$ | 2.00 million current US$ | 65.00 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.10 billion current US$ | 2.42 million current US$ | 2.98 billion current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.89 billion current US$ | 914.37 million current US$ | 3.05 billion current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.24 billion current US$ | 1.01 billion current US$ | 1.48 billion current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Afghanistan
More aid effectiveness data for Afghanistan
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 3.39 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 2.49 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 43.34 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 370.06 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 38.45 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 275.22 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 23.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 142.85 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 16.33 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 165.64 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Afghanistan?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Afghanistan was 1.18 billion current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in Afghanistan?
- The highest recorded value was 3.05 billion current US$ in 2011.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in Afghanistan?
- The lowest recorded value was -7.00 million current US$ in 1981.
- How does Afghanistan rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
- Afghanistan ranks 6th out of 164 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) rising or falling in Afghanistan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 30.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Afghanistan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) with 200 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) with 200 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.