Guatemala vs Late-demographic dividend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)

Guatemala
234.16 million current US$
in 2023
Late-demographic dividend
1.78 billion current US$
in 2022
Guatemala rank
32nd
Late-demographic dividend rank
32nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time

  • Guatemala
  • Late-demographic dividend
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B2.5B196019912023

How they compare

Late-demographic dividend currently reports 1.78 billion current US$ against 234.16 million current US$ in Guatemala, a difference of 1.55 billion current US$.

That makes Late-demographic dividend's figure about 7.6 times Guatemala's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, Late-demographic dividend has been ahead every year.

Guatemala ranks 32nd and Late-demographic dividend ranks 32nd of 164 countries.

Late-demographic dividend has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Late-demographic dividend Difference Ahead
1970s 18.10 million current US$ 477.60 million current US$ 459.50 million current US$ Late-demographic dividend
1980s 69.10 million current US$ 345.70 million current US$ 276.60 million current US$ Late-demographic dividend
1990s 55.08 million current US$ 960.09 million current US$ 905.01 million current US$ Late-demographic dividend
2000s 61.33 million current US$ 1.75 billion current US$ 1.69 billion current US$ Late-demographic dividend
2010s 136.76 million current US$ 1.34 billion current US$ 1.21 billion current US$ Late-demographic dividend
2020s 208.15 million current US$ 1.78 billion current US$ 1.58 billion current US$ Late-demographic dividend

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), Guatemala or Late-demographic dividend?
Late-demographic dividend, at 1.78 billion current US$ against 234.16 million current US$ in Guatemala as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between Guatemala and Late-demographic dividend?
1.55 billion current US$, with Late-demographic dividend ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Late-demographic dividend?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do Guatemala and Late-demographic dividend rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
Guatemala ranks 32nd and Late-demographic dividend ranks 32nd of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Late-demographic dividend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-gaps-filled/guatemala/late-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-gaps-filled/guatemala/late-demographic-dividend/">Guatemala vs Late-demographic dividend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 9,809 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) with 200 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.