Guatemala vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)

Guatemala
234.16 million current US$
in 2023
South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
2.19 billion current US$
in 2022
Guatemala rank
32nd
South Asia (IDA & IBRD) rank
29th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time

  • Guatemala
  • South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B5.0B196019912023

How they compare

South Asia (IDA & IBRD) currently reports 2.19 billion current US$ against 234.16 million current US$ in Guatemala, a difference of 1.96 billion current US$.

That makes South Asia (IDA & IBRD)'s figure about 9.4 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1970 it was South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ahead.

Guatemala ranks 32nd and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 29th of 164 countries.

South Asia (IDA & IBRD) has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala South Asia (IDA & IBRD) Difference Ahead
1970s 18.10 million current US$ 469.90 million current US$ 451.80 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
1980s 69.10 million current US$ 452.20 million current US$ 383.10 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
1990s 55.08 million current US$ 196.34 million current US$ 141.26 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
2000s 61.33 million current US$ 1.61 billion current US$ 1.55 billion current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
2010s 136.76 million current US$ 3.03 billion current US$ 2.89 billion current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
2020s 208.15 million current US$ 2.18 billion current US$ 1.98 billion current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), Guatemala or South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
South Asia (IDA & IBRD), at 2.19 billion current US$ against 234.16 million current US$ in Guatemala as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between Guatemala and South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
1.96 billion current US$, with South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do Guatemala and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
Guatemala ranks 32nd and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 29th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-gaps-filled/guatemala/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-gaps-filled/guatemala/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/">Guatemala vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 9,809 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) with 200 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.