Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Serbia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)

Congo, Democratic Republic of the
539.05 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Serbia
535.6 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
67th
Serbia rank
68th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time

  • Congo, Democratic Republic of the
  • Serbia
05001.0k1.5k196119922023

How they compare

Congo, Democratic Republic of the currently reports 539.05 current US$ per square kilometre against 535.6 current US$ per square kilometre in Serbia, a difference of 3.45 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 67th and Serbia ranks 68th of 162 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Congo, Democratic Republic of the averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo, Democratic Republic of the Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 155.07 current US$ per square kilometre 1,124 current US$ per square kilometre 968.56 current US$ per square kilometre Serbia
2010s 229.29 current US$ per square kilometre 356.9 current US$ per square kilometre 127.61 current US$ per square kilometre Serbia
2020s 385.68 current US$ per square kilometre 380.48 current US$ per square kilometre 5.2 current US$ per square kilometre Congo, Democratic Republic of the

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Serbia?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the, at 539.05 current US$ per square kilometre against 535.6 current US$ per square kilometre in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Serbia?
3.45 current US$ per square kilometre, with Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Serbia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 67th and Serbia ranks 68th of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Serbia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/serbia/">Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Serbia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
209 places, 9,389 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.