Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Congo, Democratic Republic of the
Congo, Democratic Republic of the: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) was 539.05 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
539.05 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 104.2%
World rank
67th
of 162 countries
All-time high
624.36 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2003
All-time low
0.0573 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1998
Years of data
60
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Congo, Democratic Republic of the is 539.05 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is up 104.2% on the previous year and up 284.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Congo, Democratic Republic of the peaked at 624.36 current US$ per square kilometre in 2003 and was at its lowest, 0.0573 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1998.
That places Congo, Democratic Republic of the 67th out of 162 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 28.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +2033.3% |
| 1963 | 15.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.7% |
| 1964 | 16.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1965 | 19.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.0% |
| 1966 | 14.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.3% |
| 1967 | 13.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 1968 | 7.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.4% |
| 1969 | 5.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.1% |
| 1970 | 4.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 1971 | 5.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 1972 | 3.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 1973 | 1.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.6% |
| 1974 | 3.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1975 | 1.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1976 | 7.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +325.0% |
| 1977 | 10.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.2% |
| 1978 | 9.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.5% |
| 1979 | 19.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +109.5% |
| 1980 | 4.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.0% |
| 1981 | 9.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +90.9% |
| 1982 | 7.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.8% |
| 1983 | 10.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.7% |
| 1984 | 3.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.2% |
| 1985 | 16.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +375.0% |
| 1986 | 10.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.5% |
| 1987 | 17.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +73.9% |
| 1988 | 15.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 1989 | 23.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.2% |
| 1990 | 14.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.6% |
| 1991 | 18.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.2% |
| 1992 | 15 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.0% |
| 1993 | 3.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -76.5% |
| 1994 | 0.4411 current US$ per square kilometre | -87.5% |
| 1998 | 0.0573 current US$ per square kilometre | -87.0% |
| 1999 | 4.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +8492.3% |
| 2000 | 5.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.1% |
| 2001 | 8.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.7% |
| 2002 | 35.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +295.4% |
| 2003 | 624.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +1669.5% |
| 2004 | 83.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -86.6% |
| 2005 | 63.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.3% |
| 2006 | 369.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +483.7% |
| 2007 | 58.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -84.2% |
| 2008 | 86.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.5% |
| 2009 | 105.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.4% |
| 2010 | 120.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.1% |
| 2011 | 566.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +371.1% |
| 2012 | 123.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -78.2% |
| 2013 | 140.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.7% |
| 2014 | 169.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.1% |
| 2015 | 339.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +99.8% |
| 2016 | 148.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.2% |
| 2017 | 195 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.1% |
| 2018 | 205.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2019 | 285.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.0% |
| 2020 | 343.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.4% |
| 2021 | 396.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.5% |
| 2022 | 263.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.4% |
| 2023 | 539.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +104.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 13.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 28.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 6.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 19.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 11.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 23.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 8.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0573 current US$ per square kilometre | 18.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 7 |
| 2000s | 144.15 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 624.36 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 229.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 120.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 566.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 385.68 current US$ per square kilometre | 263.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 539.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- 64 Burkina Faso 640.44 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 65 Zambia 583.4 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 66 Colombia 572.68 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 68 Serbia 535.6 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 69 Tajikistan 528.22 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 70 Cape Verde 515.44 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 413,634 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 113.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 60.36 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 248.93 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 37.72 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 144.59 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 87.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 49.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 9.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 50.61 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Congo, Democratic Republic of the was 539.05 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- The highest recorded value was 624.36 current US$ per square kilometre in 2003.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0573 current US$ per square kilometre in 1998.
- How does Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 67th out of 162 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) rising or falling in Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- Over the last ten years it is up 284.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Congo, Democratic Republic of the data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 60 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.