Cuba vs Guatemala: Net ODA received
Net ODA received over time
- Cuba
- Guatemala
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0.5% against 0.4% in Guatemala, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Guatemala ahead.
Cuba ranks 111th and Guatemala ranks 114th of 162 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Guatemala in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.2% | 0.8% | 0.6% | Guatemala |
| 1980s | 0.2% | 1.4% | 1.2% | Guatemala |
| 1990s | 0.2% | 1.7% | 1.5% | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 0.2% | 1.3% | 1.1% | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 0.7% | 0.7% | 0.0% | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received, Cuba or Guatemala?
- Cuba, at 0.5% against 0.4% in Guatemala as of 2019.
- What is the difference in net oda received between Cuba and Guatemala?
- 0.1%, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Guatemala?
- 50 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2019.
- How do Cuba and Guatemala rank globally for net oda received?
- Cuba ranks 111th and Guatemala ranks 114th of 162 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net ODA received (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official development assistance (ODA) consists of disbursements of loans made on concessional terms (net of repayments of principal) and grants by official agencies of the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC), by multilateral institutions, and by non-DAC countries to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. It includes loans with a grant element of at least 25 percent (calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent).