Eritrea vs IBRD only: Net ODA received (% of GNI)
Net ODA received (% of GNI) over time
- Eritrea
- IBRD only
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 6.5% against 0.1% in IBRD only, a difference of 6.4%.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 58.4 times IBRD only's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 1992 it was IBRD only ahead.
Eritrea ranks 39th and IBRD only ranks 36th of 163 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | IBRD only | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 19.3% | 0.4% | 18.8% | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 22.8% | 0.3% | 22.6% | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 8.2% | 0.1% | 8.1% | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received, Eritrea or IBRD only?
- Eritrea, at 6.5% against 0.1% in IBRD only as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net oda received between Eritrea and IBRD only?
- 6.4%, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and IBRD only?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and IBRD only rank globally for net oda received?
- Eritrea ranks 39th and IBRD only ranks 36th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net ODA received (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official development assistance (ODA) consists of disbursements of loans made on concessional terms (net of repayments of principal) and grants by official agencies of the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC), by multilateral institutions, and by non-DAC countries to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. It includes loans with a grant element of at least 25 percent (calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent).