Libya vs Panama: Net ODA received
Net ODA received over time
- Libya
- Panama
How they compare
Libya currently reports 1.0% against 0.9% in Panama, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Panama ahead.
Libya ranks 110th and Panama ranks 112th of 153 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 3 and Panama in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.1% | 1.1% | 1.0% | Panama |
| 1980s | 0.1% | 0.5% | 0.4% | Panama |
| 1990s | 0.1% | 0.9% | 0.9% | Panama |
| 2000s | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.1% | Libya |
| 2010s | 1.2% | 0.1% | 1.1% | Libya |
| 2020s | 1.3% | 0.6% | 0.7% | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received, Libya or Panama?
- Libya, at 1.0% against 0.9% in Panama as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net oda received between Libya and Panama?
- 0.1%, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Panama?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Panama rank globally for net oda received?
- Libya ranks 110th and Panama ranks 112th of 153 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net ODA received (% of imports of goods, services and primary income). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official development assistance (ODA) consists of disbursements of loans made on concessional terms (net of repayments of principal) and grants by official agencies of the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC), by multilateral institutions, and by non-DAC countries to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. It includes loans with a grant element of at least 25 percent (calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent).