Costa Rica vs Kyrgyzstan: Net official development assistance received (constant 2023 US$), per

Costa Rica
2,832 constant 2023 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kyrgyzstan
2,297 constant 2023 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
97th
Kyrgyzstan rank
100th

Net official development assistance received (constant 2023 US$), per over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Kyrgyzstan
05.0k10.0k15.0k196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 2,832 constant 2023 US$ per square kilometre against 2,297 constant 2023 US$ per square kilometre in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 535 constant 2023 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.2 times Kyrgyzstan's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 97th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 100th of 168 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Kyrgyzstan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Kyrgyzstan Difference Ahead
1990s 1,539 constant 2023 US$ per square kilometre 1,179 constant 2023 US$ per square kilometre 360.32 constant 2023 US$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 998.52 constant 2023 US$ per square kilometre 1,395 constant 2023 US$ per square kilometre 396.57 constant 2023 US$ per square kilometre Kyrgyzstan
2010s 1,439 constant 2023 US$ per square kilometre 2,728 constant 2023 US$ per square kilometre 1,289 constant 2023 US$ per square kilometre Kyrgyzstan
2020s 5,538 constant 2023 US$ per square kilometre 2,867 constant 2023 US$ per square kilometre 2,671 constant 2023 US$ per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official development assistance received (constant 2023 us$), per, Costa Rica or Kyrgyzstan?
Costa Rica, at 2,832 constant 2023 US$ per square kilometre against 2,297 constant 2023 US$ per square kilometre in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official development assistance received (constant 2023 us$), per between Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
535 constant 2023 US$ per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for net official development assistance received (constant 2023 us$), per?
Costa Rica ranks 97th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 100th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official development assistance received (constant 2023 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Kyrgyzstan: Net official development assistance received (constant 2023 US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-development-assistance-received-constant-2023-us-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-development-assistance-received-constant-2023-us-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/kyrgyz-republic/">Costa Rica vs Kyrgyzstan: Net official development assistance received (constant 2023 US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official development assistance received (constant 2023 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2023 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 11,179 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net official development assistance received (constant 2023 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.