Africa Eastern and Southern vs Bangladesh: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square

Africa Eastern and Southern
14.06 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2019
Bangladesh
161.23 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Africa Eastern and Southern rank
15th
Bangladesh rank
15th

Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square over time

  • Africa Eastern and Southern
  • Bangladesh
0200400600197920012023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 161.23 current US$ per square kilometre against 14.06 current US$ per square kilometre in Africa Eastern and Southern, a difference of 147.17 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 11.5 times Africa Eastern and Southern's.

Across all 40 years both countries report, Bangladesh has been ahead every year.

Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 15th and Bangladesh ranks 15th of 45 groups.

Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Africa Eastern and Southern Bangladesh Difference Ahead
1980s 2.93 current US$ per square kilometre 84.44 current US$ per square kilometre 81.51 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
1990s 2.4 current US$ per square kilometre 56 current US$ per square kilometre 53.61 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2000s 5.78 current US$ per square kilometre 57.71 current US$ per square kilometre 51.93 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2010s 10.34 current US$ per square kilometre 166.54 current US$ per square kilometre 156.2 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square, Africa Eastern and Southern or Bangladesh?
Bangladesh, at 161.23 current US$ per square kilometre against 14.06 current US$ per square kilometre in Africa Eastern and Southern as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square between Africa Eastern and Southern and Bangladesh?
147.17 current US$ per square kilometre, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Africa Eastern and Southern and Bangladesh?
40 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2019.
How do Africa Eastern and Southern and Bangladesh rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square?
Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 15th and Bangladesh ranks 15th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Africa Eastern and Southern vs Bangladesh: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-ifad-current-us-per-square-kilometre/africa-eastern-and-southern/bangladesh/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-ifad-current-us-per-square-kilometre/africa-eastern-and-southern/bangladesh/">Africa Eastern and Southern vs Bangladesh: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 5,908 data points, 1979–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.