Central Europe and the Baltics vs Grenada: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual

Central Europe and the Baltics
-50 % change on previous year
in 2008
Grenada
78.95 % change on previous year
in 2008
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
7th
Grenada rank
10th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Grenada
-1000100200198119942008

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 78.95 % change on previous year against -50 % change on previous year in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 128.95 % change on previous year.

That makes Grenada's figure about 1.6 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Grenada ahead.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 7th and Grenada ranks 10th of 46 groups.

Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Grenada Difference Ahead
1990s 11.81 % change on previous year 34.76 % change on previous year 22.95 % change on previous year Grenada
2000s -4.01 % change on previous year 16.48 % change on previous year 20.49 % change on previous year Grenada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual, Central Europe and the Baltics or Grenada?
Grenada, at 78.95 % change on previous year against -50 % change on previous year in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual between Central Europe and the Baltics and Grenada?
128.95 % change on previous year, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Grenada?
17 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2008.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Grenada rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 7th and Grenada ranks 10th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Grenada: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-annual-growth-rate/central-europe-and-the-baltics/grenada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-annual-growth-rate/central-europe-and-the-baltics/grenada/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Grenada: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 6,930 data points, 1970–2009
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.