Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual in Central Europe and the Baltics
Central Europe and the Baltics: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual was -50 % change on previous year in 2008. ◆ Volatile
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual in Central Europe and the Baltics, 1991–2008
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual in Central Europe and the Baltics is -50 % change on previous year, measured in 2008.
That represents a change of down 166.3% on the previous year and down 193.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual in Central Europe and the Baltics peaked at 75.38 % change on previous year in 2007 and was at its lowest, -81.37 % change on previous year, in 2005.
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 7th of 46 groups on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual in Central Europe and the Baltics, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1991 | 11.76 % change on previous year | — |
| 1992 | 8.42 % change on previous year | -28.4% |
| 1993 | -14.81 % change on previous year | -275.8% |
| 1994 | 60.97 % change on previous year | -511.8% |
| 1995 | 12.57 % change on previous year | -79.4% |
| 1996 | -1.26 % change on previous year | -110.0% |
| 1997 | -13.54 % change on previous year | +976.0% |
| 1998 | 53.22 % change on previous year | -493.2% |
| 1999 | -11.06 % change on previous year | -120.8% |
| 2000 | -19.05 % change on previous year | +72.3% |
| 2001 | -9.85 % change on previous year | -48.3% |
| 2002 | 0.1852 % change on previous year | -101.9% |
| 2003 | 29.57 % change on previous year | +15870.5% |
| 2004 | -22.68 % change on previous year | -176.7% |
| 2005 | -81.37 % change on previous year | +258.7% |
| 2006 | -35.64 % change on previous year | -56.2% |
| 2007 | 75.38 % change on previous year | -311.5% |
| 2008 | -50 % change on previous year | -166.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.81 % change on previous year | -14.81 % change on previous year | 60.97 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 2000s | -12.61 % change on previous year | -81.37 % change on previous year | 75.38 % change on previous year | 9 |
Countries ranked near Central Europe and the Baltics
- 4 Kuwait 252.94 % change on previous year compare
- 5 Singapore 176.19 % change on previous year compare
- 6 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 123.53 % change on previous year compare
- 7 Bahamas 119.44 % change on previous year compare
- 8 Antigua and Barbuda 87.5 % change on previous year compare
- 9 French Polynesia 80 % change on previous year
- 10 Grenada 78.95 % change on previous year compare
More aid effectiveness data for Central Europe and the Baltics
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 5.74 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 10,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 110,000 current US$ (2009)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 105.39 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 70,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 22.53 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 3.77 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.05 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 280,000 current US$ (2011)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.88 million current US$ (2010)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- Net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual in Central Europe and the Baltics was -50 % change on previous year in 2008, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual recorded in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- The highest recorded value was 75.38 % change on previous year in 2007.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual recorded in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- The lowest recorded value was -81.37 % change on previous year in 2005.
- How does Central Europe and the Baltics rank for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual?
- Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 7th out of 46 groups with data for 2008.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual rising or falling in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- Over the last ten years it is down 193.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Central Europe and the Baltics data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 18 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.