East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Latvia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
-75.58 % change on previous year
in 2008
Latvia
4.76 % change on previous year
in 2004
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
26th
Latvia rank
25th
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual over time
- East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 4.76 % change on previous year against -75.58 % change on previous year in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 80.34 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 12 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Latvia ahead.
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 26th and Latvia ranks 25th of 46 groups.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 32.22 % change on previous year | 59.84 % change on previous year | 27.62 % change on previous year | Latvia |
| 2000s | 1.78 % change on previous year | 10.72 % change on previous year | 8.94 % change on previous year | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual, East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 4.76 % change on previous year against -75.58 % change on previous year in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual between East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Latvia?
- 80.34 % change on previous year, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Latvia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2004.
- How do East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Latvia rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual?
- East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 26th and Latvia ranks 25th of 46 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.