Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual in Latvia

Latvia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual was 4.76 % change on previous year in 2004. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2004)
4.76 % change on previous year
Change on year
up 110.6%
World rank
25th
of 170 countries
All-time high
171.43 % change on previous year
in 2002
All-time low
-58.82 % change on previous year
in 2001
Years of data
12
1993–2004

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual in Latvia, 1993–2004

-500501001501993199820041993: 125 % change on previous year1994: 88.9 % change on previous year1995: 88.2 % change on previous year1996: -56.2 % change on previous year1997: 14.3 % change on previous year1998: 156.2 % change on previous year1999: 2.4 % change on previous year2000: -19 % change on previous year2001: -58.8 % change on previous year2002: 171.4 % change on previous year2003: -44.7 % change on previous year2004: 4.8 % change on previous year

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.

Analysis

Latvia recorded 4.76 % change on previous year for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual in 2004.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 110.6% on the previous year and down 94.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual in Latvia peaked at 171.43 % change on previous year in 2002 and was at its lowest, -58.82 % change on previous year, in 2001.

Latvia ranks 25th of 170 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual in Latvia, year by year

Annual values for Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual growth rate in Latvia, 1993 to 2004.
Year % change on previous year Change
1993 125 % change on previous year
1994 88.89 % change on previous year -28.9%
1995 88.24 % change on previous year -0.7%
1996 -56.25 % change on previous year -163.7%
1997 14.29 % change on previous year -125.4%
1998 156.25 % change on previous year +993.8%
1999 2.44 % change on previous year -98.4%
2000 -19.05 % change on previous year -881.0%
2001 -58.82 % change on previous year +208.8%
2002 171.43 % change on previous year -391.4%
2003 -44.74 % change on previous year -126.1%
2004 4.76 % change on previous year -110.6%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 59.84 % change on previous year -56.25 % change on previous year 156.25 % change on previous year 7
2000s 10.72 % change on previous year -58.82 % change on previous year 171.43 % change on previous year 5

Countries ranked near Latvia

  1. 22 Poland 21.95 % change on previous year compare
  2. 23 Dominica 21.74 % change on previous year compare
  3. 24 Belize 7.14 % change on previous year compare
  4. 26 Lithuania 3.12 % change on previous year compare
  5. 27 Cuba 0 % change on previous year compare
  6. 27 Israel 0 % change on previous year

See the full ranking of 216 places →

More aid effectiveness data for Latvia

All data for Latvia →

Frequently asked questions

What is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual in Latvia?
Net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual in Latvia was 4.76 % change on previous year in 2004, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual recorded in Latvia?
The highest recorded value was 171.43 % change on previous year in 2002.
What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual recorded in Latvia?
The lowest recorded value was -58.82 % change on previous year in 2001.
How does Latvia rank for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual?
Latvia ranks 25th out of 170 countries with data for 2004.
Is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual rising or falling in Latvia?
Over the last ten years it is down 94.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Latvia data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual in Latvia. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-annual-growth-rate/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-annual-growth-rate/latvia/">Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual in Latvia</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

The year-on-year percentage change in Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 6,930 data points, 1970–2009
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.