Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Mozambique: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled

Bosnia and Herzegovina
840,000 current US$
in 2008
Mozambique
820,000 current US$
in 2008
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
50th
Mozambique rank
52nd

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Mozambique
01.0M2.0M3.0M197619922008

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 840,000 current US$ against 820,000 current US$ in Mozambique, a difference of 20,000 current US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Mozambique ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 50th and Mozambique ranks 52nd of 172 countries.

Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Mozambique Difference Ahead
1990s 503,333 current US$ 1.97 million current US$ 1.46 million current US$ Mozambique
2000s 673,333 current US$ 2.10 million current US$ 1.43 million current US$ Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Mozambique?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 840,000 current US$ against 820,000 current US$ in Mozambique as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mozambique?
20,000 current US$, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mozambique?
15 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2008.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mozambique rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 50th and Mozambique ranks 52nd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Mozambique: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-gaps-filled/bosnia-and-herzegovina/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-gaps-filled/bosnia-and-herzegovina/mozambique/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Mozambique: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 7,636 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) with 75 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.