Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled in Mozambique
Mozambique: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled was 820,000 current US$ in 2008. ◆ Volatile
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled in Mozambique, 1976–2008
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled in Mozambique is 820,000 current US$, measured in 2008.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 65.3% on the previous year and down 45.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled in Mozambique peaked at 3.01 million current US$ in 1995 and was at its lowest, 90,000 current US$, in 1976.
Mozambique ranks 52nd of 172 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled in Mozambique, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1976 | 90,000 current US$ | — |
| 1977 | 800,000 current US$ | +788.9% |
| 1978 | 610,000 current US$ | -23.8% |
| 1979 | 200,000 current US$ | -67.2% |
| 1980 | 280,000 current US$ | +40.0% |
| 1981 | 560,000 current US$ | +100.0% |
| 1982 | 450,000 current US$ | -19.6% |
| 1983 | 880,000 current US$ | +95.6% |
| 1984 | 960,000 current US$ | +9.1% |
| 1985 | 1.40 million current US$ | +45.8% |
| 1986 | 1.07 million current US$ | -23.6% |
| 1987 | 1.49 million current US$ | +39.3% |
| 1988 | 720,000 current US$ | -51.7% |
| 1989 | 1.19 million current US$ | +65.3% |
| 1990 | 1.33 million current US$ | +11.8% |
| 1991 | 1.61 million current US$ | +21.1% |
| 1992 | 1.32 million current US$ | -18.0% |
| 1993 | 2.03 million current US$ | +53.8% |
| 1994 | 1.36 million current US$ | -33.0% |
| 1995 | 3.01 million current US$ | +121.3% |
| 1996 | 2.08 million current US$ | -30.9% |
| 1997 | 1.72 million current US$ | -17.3% |
| 1998 | 1.49 million current US$ | -13.4% |
| 1999 | 2.13 million current US$ | +43.0% |
| 2000 | 2.21 million current US$ | +3.8% |
| 2001 | 1.32 million current US$ | -40.3% |
| 2002 | 2.77 million current US$ | +109.8% |
| 2003 | 2.88 million current US$ | +4.0% |
| 2004 | 2.44 million current US$ | -15.3% |
| 2005 | 2.82 million current US$ | +15.6% |
| 2006 | 1.32 million current US$ | -53.2% |
| 2007 | 2.36 million current US$ | +78.8% |
| 2008 | 820,000 current US$ | -65.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 425,000 current US$ | 90,000 current US$ | 800,000 current US$ | 4 |
| 1980s | 900,000 current US$ | 280,000 current US$ | 1.49 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.81 million current US$ | 1.32 million current US$ | 3.01 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.10 million current US$ | 820,000 current US$ | 2.88 million current US$ | 9 |
Countries ranked near Mozambique
More aid effectiveness data for Mozambique
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 12.66 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 17.60 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 55.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 143.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 35.43 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 60.24 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 9.71 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 38.52 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 33.56 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 120.62 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled in Mozambique?
- Net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled in Mozambique was 820,000 current US$ in 2008, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled recorded in Mozambique?
- The highest recorded value was 3.01 million current US$ in 1995.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled recorded in Mozambique?
- The lowest recorded value was 90,000 current US$ in 1976.
- How does Mozambique rank for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled?
- Mozambique ranks 52nd out of 172 countries with data for 2008.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled rising or falling in Mozambique?
- Over the last ten years it is down 45.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Mozambique data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 33 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) with 75 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) with 75 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.